Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
Acting Chief Justice of Karnataka, ACJ
The petitioner – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks cbi investigation due to allegations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background context involving various respondents and complaints. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. petitioner's arguments for independent investigation. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. respondents refute petitioner's claims; assert lokayukta's independence. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. counterarguments regarding the necessity of handing over investigations. (Para 11) |
| 6. court identifies independence of the lokayukta. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 7. judicial precedent on independence of investigating agencies. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 8. standards for transferring investigations to the cbi. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 9. criteria for court's extraordinary power to transfer investigations. (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 10. court's discretion in managing police investigations. (Para 36 , 37) |
| 11. final dismissal of the petition due to lack of justification. (Para 42 , 43) |
CAV ORDER
The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing transfer of investigation in P.C.R.No.28 of 2024 to the hands of an independent agency, like that of the Central Bureau of Investigation (‘CBI’ for short) to investigate into the alleged acts of re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
