SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 1791

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
sunny mahato – Appellant
Versus
the state of karnataka – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:R. KIRAN ,Respondent Advocate:

ORAL ORDER

The petitioners-accused Nos.1 to 4 who are facing trial for the offences punishable under Sections 3,4,5,6 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 and Section 370 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 are before this Court seeking relief.

2. The prosecution alleges that the Inspector of C.C.B, OCW Wing, received information on 16.06.2022, that certain illicit and immoral activities were being carried out at a Spa-centre. He informed his superiors and along with Police personnel and witnesses conducted the raid at the Spa from 7.30 p.m. to 10 p.m., and upon raid and inspection, 8 foreign women nationals were rescued, and 5 customers of the Spa were taken into custody. The petitioners No. 1 and 2 were present at the spot at the time of conducting of the raid.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent-State.

4. In the instant case, the Sub-Inspector of the Police has conducted an investigation and after completing the investigation, submitted the charge sheet.

5. Section 2(i) of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 defines ‘special police officer’ as a police officer appointed by or on behalf of the State Gover

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top