Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR J
SRI. VINIL PHILIP CHERIAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court assesses allegations concerning the applicability of ipc sections. (Para 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. charges are found inapplicable; proceedings constitute abuse of process. (Para 6 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. final judgment quashes the pending proceedings against the petitioner. (Para 11) |
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the impugned proceedings in C.C.No.11503/2019 arising out of Crime No.349/2018 against the petitioner for offences punishable under Sections 408 and 420 of the IPC on the file of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned HCGP for respondent No.1 and perused the material on record.
3. Respondent No.2 having been served with notice of the petition, has chosen to remain unrepresented and has not contested the petition.
4. A perusal of the material on record will indicate that respondent No.2, who is an Enforcement Officer of the Employees Provident Fund Organization, filed a complaint to the effect that the petitioner who is the Managing Partner of M/s. Social DNA Labs LLP had not deposited the requisite provident fund amount of Rs.3,17,796
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
