Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
S VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J
SHOAIB S/O LATE UMMAR HUSSAIN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and bail applications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the allegations and nature of offenses charged. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments for and against the bail petitions. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's observations on the charges and judicial discretion. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. legal principles regarding bail applications. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. final decision allowing bail. (Para 13 , 14) |
ORAL ORDER
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
4. Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that deceased had illicit relationship with accused no.1. After his family members came to know about the same, he has committed suicide. False allegations have been made against the petitioners for extraneous reasons. There was no allegation in the first information about demand of ransom or kidnap of the deceased by the accused. Even in the remand applications, there is no mention about demand of ransom or kidnap of deceased by the accused. As against accused Nos.3 to 6 are concerned, charge sheet has been filed only for offences punishable under Sections 50, 61(2), 108 read with Section 190 of BNS , 2023 and the maximum punishment for the said offences is imprisonment for a period of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
