Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J
SHANTA W/O. YALLAPPA DHAKALUCHE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership and heirs of property. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. ulc act proceedings and its impact. (Para 3) |
| 3. procedural actions and property rights. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court's procedural assessment and findings. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. finality of ulc proceedings. (Para 8) |
| 6. compensation entitlement regarding land. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 7. dismissal of petition with no directives. (Para 11 , 12) |
CAV ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. The Petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
a) Declare that the ULC proceedings initiated by the Competent Authority in ULC/D/SR 2703 stand abated in view of section 4 of the ULC repeal act 1999;
b) Declare that the Kabja Panchanama Annexure-E and Kabja Pavati Annexure-F are null and void ab initio;
c) Issue a Writ of Mandamus to the Respondents No.2 to restore the names of the petitioners in R.S.No.203/4/4 measuring 3035.10 sq.mtrs. of angol and 30 gunthas in R.S.No.701 of Angol, Belagavi;
d) Grant any other relief deemed fit in the circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity;
e) Direct the Respondent No.4 to pay compensation to the petitioners at the present market value for the extent of 2 Acres 9 Guntha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
