Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
V KAMESWAR RAO, S RACHAIAH, JJ
M/S. RHEOTECH FOUNDRY PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
MRS. SHOBHA VIKRAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disputes on rental payments and tenancy termination. (Para 2 , 3 , 6) |
| 2. court's observations on evidentiary issues related to rental agreements. (Para 11 , 12 , 15) |
| 3. grounds for dismissing appeal and affirming lower court's decision. (Para 17 , 18) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
This appeal has been filed by the appellant challenging the judgment and decree dated 19.12.2023 passed in Com.O.S.No.57/2022, whereby the Court of X Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru Rural District, Bengaluru (‘Trial Court’ for short) has decreed the suit filed by the respondent herein by stating in paragraph No.90 as under:
ORDER
The relief of set off claimed by the defendant as mentioned in its written statement is hereby rejected. The defendant is directed to quit, vacate and handover the vacant possession of the suit schedule property to the plaintiff within 4 months from the date of this order.
Further, it is ordered that the defendant is liable to pay GST at the rate of 18% on the above said arrears of rent. After receiving the said arrears of rent along with GST, the plaintiff is liable to pay the said GST to the concerned Government Department.
Further, office of this court is directed to s
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
