Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI, MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA, JJ
Parappa Basavantappa Mulwad – Appellant
Versus
Nagawwa @ Laxmi W/o. Annappa Nagnur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. defendant no.1's claims (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. trial court's findings (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 15 , 16) |
| 3. plaintiffs' support for judgment (Para 13 , 14) |
| 4. evidence of plaintiffs (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. witness testimonies (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. trial court's conclusion (Para 26 , 27) |
| 7. appeal outcome (Para 28) |
CAV JUDGMENT
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA)
Defendant No.1 in O.S.No.195/2013, has preferred this appeal against the judgment and decree passed in the said case dated 26th March 2019, on the file of learned Prl.Senior Civil Judge, Gokak, (for short, `trial Court’). 2. We refer to the parties as per their ranks before the trial Court.
3. Plaintiffs No.1 and 2 (respondents No.1 and 2 herein) have filed the suit contending that plaintiffs and defendant No.3 are daughters and son of defendants No.1 and 2; Defendant No.4 is the wife and defendants No.5 to 7 are children of defendant No.1, but there was no marriage between defendant No.1 and defendant No.4; Therefore defendants No.4 to 7 are not at all related to the family of plaintiffs and defendants No.1 to 3.
4. Plaintiffs further contended that suit schedule properties are ancestral joi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
