Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD: J
SRI M A SREENIVASAN – Appellant
Versus
SMT. MIMI PARTHASARATHY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the plaintiff seeks amendment to challenge a gift deed while filing a partition suit. (Para 2) |
| 2. the respondent argues that the previous applications regarding the gift deed were dismissed. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. the court finds no error in dismissing the amendment application. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. the writ petition is dismissed. (Para 8) |
ORAL ORDER
Though the matter is listed for orders, with the consent of the parties, the same is taken up for final disposal.
2. This writ petition is filed by the plaintiff under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the order dated 01.07.2024, passed by XLIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (CCH-45), whereby the application (IA No.32) filed by the plaintiff under Order VI Rule 17 r/w. Section 151 of CPC is dismissed.
3. The plaintiff filed a suit for partition and separate possession. After service of summons, defendants appeared through counsel and filed written statement. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties, the trial court framed the issues. The matter has been posted for evidence. During that time, plaintiff filed IA No.32 under Order VI Rule 17 of CPC for amendment of the plaint on the ground
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
