SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 10237

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J
SHANMUGA SUNDARAM – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:S G BHAGAVAN ,Respondent Advocate:

ORAL ORDER

1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

a. Quash the entire proceedings in P.C.R.No.12773/2018 including the order dated 28.09.208, therein pending in the court of the IV ACMM, Bangalore, and the pursuant registration of the case in the Crime No.528/2018 of Peenya Police Station, Bangalore for the offences P/U/S 506, 34, 468, 465, 420, 504 of the IPC, in so far as the they are concerned.

2. Respondent No.2 had filed a private complaint under Section 200 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) which came to be numbered as PCR No.12773/2018. The said private complaint had been filed alleging that when the complainant had approached the Jurisdictional Police, the same was registered as NCR and no action was taken and it is in that background that the complainant sought for the Magistrate to refer the matter for investigation under subsection (3) of Section 156 of the erstwhile Cr.P.C. In furtherance thereof, the Magistrate vide its order dated 28.9.2018 referred the matter to the Peenya Police for investigation under subsection (3) of Section 156 of Cr.P.C. The jurisdictional police have registered FIR in Crime No.528/2018. It is chall

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top