SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 5068

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM, J
SRI. VENKATA REDDY – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:PRAKASH TIMMANNA HEBBAR ,Respondent Advocate:

ORAL ORDER

Petitioner is assailing the orders of third respondent – Assistant Commissioner, Bangalore South Sub Division, Bangalore dated 20.02.2023 passed in R.A(A):399/2015-16 and second respondent-Deputy Commissioner, Bangalore Urban District dated 15.11.2023 passed in RP 314/2023 wherein the authorities have entertained the appeal filed by fifth respondent and directed the revenue authorities to mutate fifth respondent’s name based on sale deed dated 28.03.1938 vide Annexure-D. The said concurrent orders passed by third respondent-Assistant Commissioner and second respondent-Deputy Commissioner are assailed before this Court.

2. Upon a meticulous examination of the relevant records, particularly the akarband and survey sketch/phodi, it becomes evident that the land originally bearing Sy.No.129 in B. Hosahalli Village, Sarjapura Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban District, encompassed a total extent of 5 acres 10 guntas. The ownership of this land was divided between two distinct sets of individuals. One portion, measuring 2 acres 28 guntas, was jointly owned by Kodiga, Venkata, and Munivenkata. The remaining extent, measuring 2 acres 22 guntas, was held by Kotekondaiah. The pre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top