SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 4292

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.NAGAPRASANNA
GYANAPPA YALLAPPA BADIGER – Appellant
Versus
THE VICE-CHANCELLOR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:H M DHARIGOND ,Respondent Advocate:

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)

1. The petitioners are before this Court calling in question a communication dated 13.06.2012 issued by the respondent No.2 by which the recovery of certain amounts that has paid to the petitioners are sought to be initiated on reworking of the dates of promotion.

2. Heard the learned counsel Sri.H.M.Dharigond appearing for petitioners and learned counsel Sri.M.Ashwathnarayan Reddy on behalf of Sri.B.Chidananda appearing for respondent No.1 and Sri.Rajashekar R. Gunjalli and Sri.Ashwanath Narayan appearing for respondent No.2.

3. Facts in brief germane are as follows:

The petitioners are working in the cadre of Senior Assistant in Kannada University Hampi. It transpires that on 22.12.2003 a representation comes to be made by the petitioners before the syndicate of the University seeking promotion from the post of Junior Assistant to the post of Senior Assistant.

4. In furtherance of the said representation after analyzing the necessary rules, the syndicate resolves to promote the petitioner to the post of Senior Assistant. The resolution of the syndicate pass through all musters and finally the petitioner was promoted as a Senior

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top