SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 4334

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
SHRI ARVIND S/O SHIVASHARANAPPAGOUD PATIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:ASHOK R KALYANASHETTY ,Respondent Advocate:

ORAL ORDER

1. The petitioner has challenged the registration of the First Information Report (FIR) for offences punishable under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2014, and Sections 127(2), 137(2), 3(5), 352, and 49 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.

2. The second respondent lodged an FIR stating that on

13.11.2024, at about 6:00 p.m., while he and his family members were in their house, a blast was carried out by persons associated with Shreya Stone Crushers, causing stones to fall on the rooftop and inside the house. On the same day, he lodged an FIR seeking action against Shreya Stone Crushers for failing to conduct the blasting operation with adequate safety measures. The complaint was registered as Crime No.165/2024 for offences punishable under Sections 125 and 288 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.

3. It is further alleged that on 16.11.2024, at about 3:00 p.m., while the complainant was at home, two persons, namely, Basavaraj, son of Sharanappa Uppar, and Sharanappa, son of Ninganagouda Sannagoudra, forcibly took him on a motorcycle and wrongfully confined him at the Shreya Stone Crusher unit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top