Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ, J
SMT. GEETHA W/O RANGAPPA WALIKAR – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KOPPAL DISTRICT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the interpretation of 'or' in the statute. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's analysis on the interpretation of 'or' and its implications. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 4. determination of the legal validity of actions taken. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 5. final order of the court. (Para 10) |
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:
i. Issue writ in the nature of certiorari to quashing the impugned notice dated 14.02.2025 bearing No. Kandaya/ Chunavane/ AA. GO/06/2024-25 issued by the R1 authority marked as Annexure-C in respect of Adhyaksha (Petitioner No.1) in the interest of justice and equity.
ii. Issue a writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned notice dated 14.02.2025 bearing No. Kandaya/ Chunavane/ AA. GO/06/2024-25 issued by the R1 authority marked as Annexure-D in respect of Upadhyaksha (Petitioner No.2) in the interest of justice and equity.
iii. Issue a writ in the nature of Certiorari thereby quashing the impugned representation/Form No.1 dated 03.02.2025 as submitted by the respondents No. 3 to 14 vide Annexure-B
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
