SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 1718

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
V.SRISHANANDA
basavaraj – Appellant
Versus
the state of karnataka – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:SRINIVAS B NAIK ,Respondent Advocate:

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)

Heard by Sri Srinivas B. Naik, learned counsel for revision petitioner and Sri Praveena Y. Devareddiyavara, learned High Court Government Pleader of respondent.

2. Accused who suffered an order of conviction for the offence punishable under Section 279, 338 and 304-A of IPC and sentenced to undergo six months simple imprisonment for the offence punishable under Section 304-A of IPC which was confirmed by the First Appellate Court in Crl.A.No.83/2013, is the revision petitioner.

3. Facts in the nutshell which are utmost necessary for disposal of the revision petition are as under:

A complaint came to be lodged by PW-3, an eyewitness to the incident contending that on 10.02.2009 at about 11.45 p.m., on the State Highway, accused being the driver of a lorry bearing No.KA-22/B-1306 drove in a rash and negligent manner, dashed against a motorcycle bearing No.KA-36/E-3083, which was proceeding from the opposite side.

3.1 In the said accident, the rider Naveenkumar Rudragouda Peerapur lost his life and pillion rider Nagaraj Sidramappa Chiniwal sustained grievous injuries.

3.2 On receipt of complaint, police thoroughly investigated the matt

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top