SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 9085

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
M.G.S. KAMAL
SMT PRANESHWARI P K – Appellant
Versus
THE BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:SHANMUKHAPPA ,Respondent Advocate:

ORAL ORDER

Present petition is filed by the petitioner-allottee of the site bearing No.1158 situated at 6th Stage, 4th 'B' Block, in further extension of Banashankari 6th phase in terms of allotment letter dated 01.02.2004. The total sale consideration required to be paid by the petitioner was Rs.7,56,000/-. Petitioner had admittedly paid the initial deposit of Rs.37,800/- on 16.10.2003, however, did not pay the balance amount within the time stipulated.

2. The respondent -BDA had called upon the petitioner to pay the balance amount vide letter dated 05.05.2004. The petitioner could not make the payment owing personal inconvience. However by letter dated 18.01.2004 petitioner had requested for extension of time for payment of said amount. Thereafter, on 06.09.2004, the petitioner stated to have paid the entire balance amount by way of cheque drawn in favour of the respondent, however, there was a delay of two months in making payment of the balance sale consideration. Since there was no response to the subsequent follow-up representations filed by the petitioner, petitioner is before this Court.

3. This court by order dated 10.04.2024 had directed the respondent -BDA to clarify if th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top