SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 1023

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
BASAVARAJ S/O SIDDAPPA CHINCEHWADI – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:S M MUCHHANDI ,Respondent Advocate:

ORAL ORDER

1. Learned Addl. Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent No.1/ State and Learned counsel Sri. S.B.

Deyannavar has filed power on behalf of respondent No.2.

2. The petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2, who have been charge sheeted for the offences punishable under Section 376(2)(i)(n), 376(3) of IPC and Section 4, 5(L) & 6 of POCSO Act, 2012, are before this Court seeking relief.

3. The prosecution alleges that on 24.08.2022, the complainant had taken his minor daughter for treatment to the hospital, wherein the doctor had advised for blood and urine test, after which, the doctor opined that she is pregnant. The complainant had enquired as to the cause of it, whereafter the victim had disclosed that her uncle accused No.1 committed sexual intercourse with her, and later when the victim was going to school, accused No.2 stated that he is in love with her and induced her to have sexual intercourse and thereafter, committed forcible sexual assault. The DNA report indicated that a child born to the survivor was on account of sexual intercourse with accused No.2.

4. The petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2, survivor and defacto complainant are present before the Court and filed jo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top