IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO, MR JUSTICE S RACHAIAH, JJ
Krishnamma W/o Late. Poovappa – Appellant
Versus
Arbitrator Cum Deputy Commissioner – Respondent
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1348 OF 2020 (AA)
ORAL JUDGMENT
(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V KAMESWAR RAO)
The challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 30.08.2019 passed in Arbitration Suit No.56/2018 whereby the learned I Addl. District Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore (for brevity, ‘Trial Court’) has dismissed the suit filed by the appellant herein under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for brevity, ‘A&C Act’ ) read with Section 3(G) (6) of National Highways Act, 1956 (for brevity, ‘NH Act’) as barred by limitation.
2. The facts to be noted for the purpose of this judgment are that the appellant herein was the absolute owner of the immovable property bearing Sy.No.68/8 measuring 0.22.00 acres of land situated at Permannur Village by virtue of the registered sale deed dated 01.11.1962 registered as document No.455/1962 in the office of the Sub-Registrar, Mangalore. It is the case of the appellant that after purchasing the said property, she made vast improvements by spending huge amount of money. Out of 22 cents of land, 15 cents of land has been acquired for the purpose of widening of the National Highway. The land was acquired for widening National Highway by fixing Rs.1,50,000/- per cent as the compensation payable for all lands compulsorily acquired in Permannnuru Village.
3. The appellant being aggrieved by the compensation granted by Special Land Acquisition Officer, filed a claim petition before the learned Arbitrator under Section 3G(5) of NH Act, 1996. The Arbitrator considering the averments made in the claim petition, passed the award dated 11.04.2017 enhancing the compensation amount to Rs. 1,75,000/-. Feeling aggrieved by the impugned award passed by the learned Arbitrator, the appellant herein approached the Trial Court under Section 34 of the A and C Act of 1996. The case of the appellant/plaintiff was that the impugned award passed by the learned Arbitrator is opposed to law and is unsustainable.
4. On the other hand, the NHA has justified the award passed by the learned Arbitrator. The said petition was filed along with an application under Section 34 (3) of A & C Act seeking condonation of delay of 65 days in filing the suit. The case of the plaintiff in support of the application for the delay was that the award dated 11.04.2017 was not communicated to her. It is stated, she came to know about the impugned award passed by the learned Arbitrator in the last week of August, 2017. Immediately thereafter, she obtained the certified copy of the same and filed the suit on 21.09.2017. It is a conceded case of the plaintiff that the suit in terms of prescribed limitation otherwise had expired on 11.08.2017. It is conceded that the suit under Section 34 of the Act was filed on 21.09.2017 with a delay of 65 days. The Trial Court while rejecting the plea of condonation of delay of 65 days has in paragraphs 16 to 18 stated as under.
“16. The plaintiff contended that the respondent No.1 neither passed the award in her presence nor after giving notice. Even though the impugned award has been passed on 11.4.2017, it was not communicated for her and she came to know about the impugned order in the last week of August 2017. Immediately she obtained the certified copy of the orders and proceeded to file the suit. Due to the said fact she was not able to file the suit well in time. Further there is no delay in filing the suit. If there is any delay it is neither intentional nor deliberate. But it is due to the bonafide reason.
17. In view of the specific case of the plaintiff regarding the non-service of the copy of the impugned award, notice was issued to the defendant No.1 to appear before the court and to say about the service of copy of the award to the appellant. On receiving the said notice, Sri.Jagadish FDA, Office of the Deputy Commissioner, D.K. Mangalore (Arbitration Section) appeared before the court and sought for time to verify and report submitting that the orders will be dispatched over post. At his request time was granted till 17.6.20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.