SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 828

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J
D M RAMU – Appellant
Versus
STATE BY – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:A V RAMAKRISHNA ,Respondent Advocate:

ORAL ORDER

In this petition, the petitioners have sought for the following reliefs:-

"Wherefore, the petitioners above named humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court be pleased to:-

a) Set aside the order dated 30.05.2015 passed by IX Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru in C.C. No.13871/2015, thereby taking cognizance of the offences punishable under section 468, 471, 420, 120(B) of I.P.C. and issuance of process against the petitioners as per Annexure-A and further all proceedings, consequently quash the charge sheet Annexure-D, now pending on the file of V Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, by allowing this criminal petition and;

b) Grant such other relief or reliefs as this Hon'ble Court deems fit under the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners–accused Nos.4 and 5 and learned counsel for respondent No.2 – de facto complainant have filed a Joint application - I.A.No.1/2025 along with Affidavit of respondent No.2. Same are taken on record.

3. Petitioner Nos.1 and 2 and respondent No.2 and their learned counsel are physically present before the Court and they admit the contents of application and the Af

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top