Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
SRI. LOKESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. accused sought bail under serious charges of murder. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. court recognized the necessity to consider evidence and circumstances. (Para 2) |
| 3. determined prima facie evidence was strong enough to deny bail. (Para 3) |
ORAL ORDER
The petitioner-accused No.1 is before this Court seeking grant of bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. in Crime No.8/2024 of Oorgaum Police Station, pending in S.C.No.118/2024, on the file of the learned III Additional District Session Judge, Kolar, sitting at K.G.F, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 114 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC'), on the basis of the first information lodged by the informant - Geetha.
2. Heard Sri. Udhaya Kumar G, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. K.P.Yashodha, learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent No.1. Perused the materials on record.
3. In view of the rival contentions urged by the learned counsel for both the parties, the point that would arise for my consideration is:
“Whether the petitioner is entitled for grant of bail under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.?”
My answer to the above point is in ‘Negative’ for the following:
R E A S O N S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
