SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 5267

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CHIEF JUSTICE AND M.I.ARUN
DR DEEPIKA LOKESH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:RAHUL S REDDY ,Respondent Advocate:

ORAL JUDGMENT

(PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA)

Heard learned advocate Mr. Rahul S. Reddy for the appellant-original petitioner, learned Government Advocate Mr..K.S. Harish for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and learned Advocate Mr..V. Srinivasa assisted by learned advocate Mr..C.M..Venkat Reddy for respondent Nos.3 to 17.

2. The challenge in this appeal is addressed to the judgment and order of learned Single Judge dated 22.01.2025, whereby the writ petition came to be dismissed and the prayers made in the petition came to be negatived.

3. The petitioner was aggrieved by a motion of no-confidence moved by 15 members of the Gram Panchayat. Pursuant to the motion moved with requisite majority of the members, the Competent Authority-the Assistant Commissioner, convened a special meeting. The petitioner called in question the said exercise, by filing the petition.

4. Before learned Single Judge as well as this Court in appeal, the solitary argument which was advanced by learned advocate for the appellant was that before moving no-confidence motion, the opportunity of hearing should have been given to the petitioner.

The petitioner held the post of Adhyaksha of the Gram Panc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top