HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
H.P.SANDESH
MR VITTAL POOJARY – Appellant
Versus
PILIKULA GOLF CLUB MANGALORE – Respondent
ORAL ORDER
1. Heard the learned counsel for revision petitioner and also the counsel for respondent. This matter is listed for admission and records are secured from the Trial Court and First Appellate Court.
2. The revision petition is filed against the concurrent finding of the Trial Court and Trial Court convicted the petitioner for offences punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act directing to take compensation of Rs.1,97,000/- out of that Rs.2,000/- shall vest with the State and remaining amount of Rs.1,95,000/- is payable to the complainant. Having considered the material available on record, particularly Ex.P1 to Ex.P11 and the petitioner has not lead any rebuttal evidence as against the evidence of the complainant and also not produced any document before the Trial Court. Being aggrieved by the said order, an appeal is filed in Crl.A.No.296/2012 and the appellate Court having re-assessed the material available on record, confirmed the order of the Trial Court and the Trial Court did not accept the contention of the appellant/revision petitioner since an authorization is given to the PW1 and also an observation is made that Section 302 of Cr.P.C is akin to t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.