Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
K. NATARAJAN, J
SRI. S. V. SOMASHEKAR – Appellant
Versus
SRI. SIDDARAMAIAH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of property ownership. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. claims and counterclaims related to property rights. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. arguments regarding legal standing and procedural issues. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. court's analysis on the legitimacy of claims. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. judgment on the validity of previous decrees. (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 6. final observations on the case's conclusion. (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
CAV JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by the appellant/plaintiff under section 96 of CPC for setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the VII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge Bangalore in OS No.4166/2004 for having dismissed the suit of the plaintiff dated 23.02.2019.
2. Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the appellant and learned senior counsel for the respondent No.2 and other respondents.
3. The ranks of the parties before the trial court are retained for the sake convenience.
4. The case of the plaintiff before the trial court is that the plaintiff filed a suit for relief of declaration;
(i) That the act of defendant No.1 in claiming any share in Survey No.73 of Srigandhadakaval, Sunkadakatte village, Magadi Road, Yashwan
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
