HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD, J
MR. BALAKRISHNA SUVARNA – Appellant
Versus
MANGALORE CITY CORPORATION LALBAUG – Respondent
ORAL ORDER
1. This writ petition under
2. Brief facts of the case of the plaintiff are as under:
a) That the plaintiff is the owner of the suit schedule property, which he purchased from Mrs. Sarojini, a neighbor who is now deceased. On the suit schedule property, the plaintiff has constructed a small shed for the purpose of preparing/manufacturing furniture and carrying out carpentry work. He has been conducting this business for more than 15 years.
b) Subsequently, one Mr.Sathish K, son of the Late Mrs.Sarojini, lodged a complaint with the Mangaluru City Corporation, alleging that the plaintiff has been creating noise pollution, sound pollution, and violating various laws. In response, the Mangaluru City Corporation issued several notices to the plaintiff, to which the plaintiff submitted a detailed reply.
c) Thereafter, the defendant, Mangaluru City
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.