Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM, J
SRI. VISHWANATH V.R. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review petition filed against prior court order. (Para 1) |
| 2. no representation by the party-in-person indicates lack of interest. (Para 2) |
| 3. review limited to mistakes apparent on record. (Para 3) |
| 4. no adjudication of rights; merely a remand order. (Para 4) |
| 5. final ruling dismissing the review petition. (Para 5) |
ORAL ORDER
This review petition is filed by party-in-person assailing the order passed in W.P.No.58193/2014.
2. Though notice was ordered through Registry to appear before the committee, party-in-person has not chosen to appear before the committee. Even there is no representation on two dates. This review petition is filed in 2016. It appears that petitioner - party-in-person is not interested in prosecuting this review petition.
3. Be that as it may, no valid grounds are raised to fulfil the ingredients of Order XLVII Rule 1 of CPC. It is a trite law that the Court cannot under the cover of review arrogate to itself the power to decide the case afresh. Parties who have suffered a decree cannot persuade to reassess the evidence. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Ramu Sahu(Dead) Through LRs and others .vs. Vinod Kumar Rawat and Others, [2020 SCC Online SC
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
