Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
N S SANJAY GOWDA, J
SRI VINEETH NARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek alignment of bye-laws. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. conflict between bbmp bye-laws and zonal regulations. (Para 3 , 4 , 32 , 33) |
| 3. ktcp act supersedes bbmp bye-laws. (Para 5 , 6 , 26 , 41) |
| 4. zonal regulations govern balcony construction. (Para 44 , 46) |
| 5. floor area ratio includes balcony area. (Para 47 , 48) |
CAV ORDER
1. W.P. No.1047/2025 is by a Limited Liability Partnership which is seeking for a direction to the respondents to align the Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Building Bye-laws, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BBMP Bye-Laws’ for short) and with the principles of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 (KMC Act) and the Bangalore Development Authority Revised Master Plan, 2015, (RMP) particularly in relation to the balcony projections.
2. W.P. No.18838/2024 is by a Structural Engineer, who is registered in the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike ('the BBMP') under the Building Bye-laws and is stated to have possessed a license as a Structural Engineer. He is also seeking for a direction in the same manner as has been sought for by the other petitioner.
3. It may be pertinent to state here that the petitioner in W.P. No.18838/2024 had also initially
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
