2025 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 2537
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
N S SANJAY GOWDA, J
SRI VINEETH NARI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
WRIT PETITION NO. 18838 OF 2024 | WRIT PETITION NO. 1047 OF 2025
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. G S KANNUR, SRI. SHIVA SHANKAR C
For the Respondents: SMT. SPOORTHI V, SRI. K B MONESH KUMAR
The Zonal Regulations of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act prevail over the BBMP Bye-Laws, allowing for lengthier balconies without restrictions, while still counting their area towards the floor area ratio.
Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227 - Writ petitions contesting the validity of Bye-law 14.3 of the Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Building Bye-Laws 2003, which limits the length of balconies. Court finds conflicting provisions regarding balcony constructions between the BBMP Bye-Laws and Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act Zonal Regulations. (Paras 3, 41, 46)
(B) Regulatory Framework - There is a clear conflict between BBMP Bye-Laws and Zonal Regulations; the latter prevails due to KTCP Act provisions. (Paras 41, 42)
(C) Construction Norms - Regulations governing balcony projections, ensuring compliance with urban development principles while allowing for longer balcony constructions without restriction under specific Zonal Regulations. (Paras 44, 46)
Facts of the case:
The petitioners, a structural engineer and an LLP, contested Bye-law 14.3, alleging conflict with the Zonal Regulations of 2015 regarding balcony projections. The BBMP restricted balcony length to 1/3rd the building's length, while Zonal Regulations imposed no such limitation.
Findings of Court:
The Zonal Regulations prevail over the BBMP Bye-Laws in matters of balcony construction, which may not be limited in length, although the area must be counted towards the floor area ratio (FAR).
Issues: The key issues revolved around the conflicts between existing BBMP Bye-Laws and subsequent Zonal Regulations regarding balcony projections and their implications on urban construction.
Ratio Decidendi: The court concluded that the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act governs land use and development, and its provisions supersede conflicting Bye-Laws framed by the BBMP.
Result: The writ petitions were disposed of, favoring the applicability of Zonal Regulations over BBMP Bye-Laws.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek alignment of bye-laws. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. conflict between bbmp bye-laws and zonal regulations. (Para 3 , 4 , 32 , 33) |
| 3. ktcp act supersedes bbmp bye-laws. (Para 5 , 6 , 26 , 41) |
| 4. zonal regulations govern balcony construction. (Para 44 , 46) |
| 5. floor area ratio includes balcony area. (Para 47 , 48) |
CAV ORDER
1. W.P. No.1047/2025 is by a Limited Liability Partnership which is seeking for a direction to the respondents to align the Bangalore Mahanagara Palike Building Bye-laws, 2003 (hereinafter referred to as ‘BBMP Bye-Laws’ for short) and with the principles of the Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976 (KMC Act) and the Bangalore Development Authority Revised Master Plan, 2015, (RMP) particularly in relation to the balcony projections.
2. W.P. No.18838/2024 is by a Structural Engineer, who is registered in the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike ('the BBMP') under the Building Bye-laws and is stated to have possessed a license as a Structural Engineer. He is also seeking for a direction in the same manner as has been sought for by the other petitioner.
3. It may be pertinent to state here that the petitioner in W.P. No.18838/2024 had also initially sought for declaring Byelaw 14.3 of BBMP Bye-Laws as ultra vires, but by the submission dated 18.07.2024, it was stated that he was not pressing for this prayer. Thus, the question to be considered in these petitions are only in relation to the prayer relating to alignment of the BBMP Bye-Laws in accordance with the provisions of the KMC Act as well as the RMP, 2015.
4. The grievance of the petitioners revolves around the provision made in respect of a balcony vis-à-vis the apparent conflict between the BBMP Bye-Laws and the Zonal Regulations (framed Revised Master Plan Zoning of Landuse and Regulations under the RMP, 2015).
5. To appreciate the context of the arguments and determine the questions raised by the petitioners, it would be essential to examine the provisions of the BBMP Act, the Building Bye Laws and also the KTCP Act and the RMP and the Zonal Regulations framed under it.
6. The BBMP was a Corporation constituted under the KMC Act, until the enactment of the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike in 2020. The BBMP under Chapter XV of the KMC Act provided for Regulation of buildings and Section 295 ,
(a) for the regulation or restriction of the use of sites or buildings, and
(b) for the regulation or restriction of building.
(2) Without prejudice to the generality of the power conferred by clause (b) of sub-section (1), bye-laws made under that clause may provide,-
(a) that no insanitary or dangerous site shall be used for building, and
(b) for the regulation or restriction of the construction of buildings intended for public worship on sites.
(3) Without prejudice to the generality of the power conferred by clause (a) of sub-section (1), bye-laws made under that clause may provide for the following matters:-
(a) information and plans to be submitted together with applications for permission to build;
(b) height of buildings, whether absolute or relative to the width of streets;
(c) level and width of foundation, level of lowest floor and stability of structure;
(d) number and height of storeys composing a building and height of rooms;
(e) provision of sufficient open space, external or internal, and adequate means of ventilation;
(f) provision of means of egress in case of fire;
(g) provision of secondary means of access for the removal of house refuse;
(h) materials and methods of construction of external and party walls, roofs, and floors;
(i) position, materials and methods of construction of hearths, smoke escapes, chimneys, staircases, privies, drains, cesspools;
(j) paving of yards;
(k) restrictions on the use of inflammable materials in buildings; the power on the BBMP to make Bye-Laws, with the approval of the Government.
(l) in the case of wells, dimens