Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR R. NATARAJ, J
SMT. FATHIMA @ SHAHEEN FATHIMA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the petitioner challenged conviction under ipc sections. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding the nature of the charge under ipc. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court found insufficient evidence for conviction under ipc. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. final decision to acquit the accused. (Para 9) |
ORDER
2. Based on a complaint of PW-8 that the accused had induced a miscarriage which resulted in medical complication, the police registered a Crime.No.229/2006 for the offence punishable under Section 312 of IPC. The jurisdictional police took up investigation and thereafter filed a charge sheet for the offence punishable under Section 312 of IPC. The trial Court took cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 312 of IPC. The accused pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried. The prosecution examined PW-1 to PW-8 of whom PW-8 was the victim and exhibits P1 to P7 were marked. Statement of the accused was recorded under Section 313 of Cr.P.C, who denied the incriminating evidence against her. Later, the prosecution filed an application under Section 216 of Cr.P.C. to include the charge under Section 269 of IPC based upon which, the trial Court charged the petitioner for the offence pun
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
