Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ, J
M/S SAMAR LIFESTYLE PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
M/ GOEL ROAD CARRIERS PVT LTD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. suit filed for recovery (Para 3 , 5) |
| 2. defendant's counsel arguments (Para 6) |
| 3. plaintiff's counsel arguments (Para 7) |
| 4. court's consideration (Para 8) |
| 5. strict adherence to timelines (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. writ petition disposed (Para 11) |
ORAL ORDER
The defendant in Com. O.S No.739/2022 on the file of LXXXVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, (henceforth referred to as ‘the Commercial Court’) has filed this petition challenging the correctness of an order dated 18.07.2024, by which, it allowed the applications filed by the plaintiff under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure , 1908 (for short, ‘CPC”) to reopen the stage of the case and to accept the written statement to the counter-claim.
2. The parties shall henceforth be referred to as they were arrayed before the Commercial Court. The petitioner herein was the defendant while the respondent was the plaintiff before the Commercial Court.
3. The suit in Com. O.S. No.739/2022 was filed for recovery of Rs.11,75,656/- along with pendente lite and future interest at 24% per annum from the date of the suit till actual realization. The defendant filed an application under Order VIII Rule 1 read with S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
