M/S SAMAR LIFESTYLE PRIVATE LIMITED vs M/ GOEL ROAD CARRIERS PVT LTD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 36245

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ, J
M/S SAMAR LIFESTYLE PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
M/ GOEL ROAD CARRIERS PVT LTD – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:R. KIRAN ,Respondent Advocate:

Table of Content
1. suit filed for recovery (Para 3 , 5)
2. defendant's counsel arguments (Para 6)
3. plaintiff's counsel arguments (Para 7)
4. court's consideration (Para 8)
5. strict adherence to timelines (Para 9 , 10)
6. writ petition disposed (Para 11)

ORAL ORDER

2. The parties shall henceforth be referred to as they were arrayed before the Commercial Court. The petitioner herein was the defendant while the respondent was the plaintiff before the Commercial Court.

“It will be appropriate for the petitioner - M/S Goel Road Carriers Pvt. Ltd. to file an application for review before the High Court, which application, if filed within a period of 30 days from today, will not be dismissed on the ground of delay. However, the application for review will be considered and decided in accordance with law and on its own merits. In case the application for review is dismissed, it will be open to the petitioner to challenge the impugned order/judgment before this Court.

4. Consequent to the above, a review petition in R.P. No.551/2023 was filed before this Court which was dismissed on 31.01.2024. Thereafter, the defendant filed an application under Order VIII Rule 6E read with Rule 10 and Section

Click Here to Read the rest of this document