CAV JUDGMENT

2. As against the dismissal of his suit plaintiff preferred a regular appeal in R.A.No.7/2020 and as against grant of counter claim in favour of defendant No.8, he filed another appeal in R.A.No.8/2020. Similarly defendant No.3 filed

3. Aggrieved by the aforesaid Judgment and decree passed by the trial Court and confirmed by the First Appellate Court, plaintiff is before this Court in RSA Nos.1064/2023 and 1069/2023 while defendant No.3 is in RSA No.1004/2023 and legal representatives of defendant No.9 are in RSA No.1141/2023.

12.01.1981. Father of plaintiff passed away on 06.10.1988. During his life time he had appointed plaintiff to succeed as Sajjadanashin of the suit Dargah. That defendants 1 to 6 who are also the Haqdars have been interfering with the plaintiff's rights in performance of his duties as Sajjadanashin and conducting of Sandal and Urs ceremony of said saint.

5. The case of the defendant Nos.2 and 3.

(b) It is further asserted that father of the plaintiff was never the Sajjada of suit Dargah and he had no right to appoint anyone