Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR PRADEEP SINGH YERUR, J
SMT.B.LAKSHMIDEVAMMA – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE SOUTH DIVISION BENGALURU – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of parties involved in the writ petition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioners allege illegal sales and seek annulment. (Para 3) |
| 3. respondents argue the legality of transactions. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. governing legal principles from precedents. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. court evaluates the legal context and grants. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. statutory interpretation regarding the sc & st act. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 7. final judgment dismissing the writ petition. (Para 21) |
ORDER
This writ petition is preferred by the petitioners seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the order passed by the Respondent No.1/Assistant Commissioner dated 27.2.2007 vide Annexure-M as well as the order passed by the Respondent No.10/ Deputy Commissioner vide Annexure-N.
2. Heard learned counsel – Dr. Nanda Kishore for the petitioners; Sri Venkat Satyanarayan, learned HCGP for Respondent Nos.1,2 and 10; Sri Dhananjay Joshi, learned senior counsel on behalf of learned counsel - Sri Vigneswara .U for Respondent No.3; and Sri B.S. Raghu Prasad for Respondent Nos.5 to 9.
3. It is the vehement contention of learned counsel – Dr. Nanda Kishore appearing on behalf of the peti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
