HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ, J
SRI.BASVAPRABHU PATIL – Appellant
Versus
SMT.PUSHPAVATHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. suit filed by the plaintiff (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. trial court's rejection (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. petition lacks merit (Para 10) |
ORAL ORDER
2. The parties shall henceforth be referred to as they were arrayed before the Trial Court. The petitioner herein was the applicant in I.A.No.1/2024 filed before the Trial Court. The respondent No.1 was the plaintiff, while the respondent Nos.2 to 5 were the defendants before the Trial Court.
i) Pass a judgment and decree against the defendants 1, 2 and 4 restraining them permanently from releasing the death benefits of late Manjesh Yadav, who was working as Senior H.R. in Defendant No.1 & 2 Company from 2015 till his death in favor of Defendant No.3.
4. When the suit was set down for the evidence of the plaintiff, an application (I.A.No.1/2024) was filed by the applicant/petitioner herein to come on record. In the affidavit accompanying the application, it was stated that the plaintiff, her husband and their son/Sri. Manjesh Yadav had availed hand loan of Rs.5,00,000/- for the purposes of marriage of Sri. Manjesh Yadav. The plaintiff, her husband and their son executed a promissory note on 09.09.2020 and agreed to repay the amount w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.