HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
SRI. N. HANUMEGOWDA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY – Respondent
Petitioner has been charge sheeted for the offence
punishable under Section 384 of IPC.
2. The summary of the charge sheet is that:
When C.W.5 and 6, on the instructions of C.W.1 were
preparing for the inauguration of the buildings, at that point of
time, the accused came to the spot and stated that, the
building is constructed without prior permission and asked for
the relevant documents and also stated that he is an RTI and
RSS activists, and if a sum of Rs.2,00,000/- is not paid, he will
see to that the Chief Minister and other dignitaries will not
attend the inauguration, and he will stall the inauguration.
- 3 -
Cognizance taken by the learned Magistrate for the aforesaid
offence is impugned in this petition.
3.
Learned
counsel
appearing
for
the
petitioner
submits that the allegations made in the FIR, even accepted on
the face of it, does not constitute an offence punishable under
Section 384 of IPC, since there is no allegation that the defacto
complainant parted with the money, and that the petitioner-
accused induced the defacto complainant and put him in fear to
deliver the money which is alleged to have been demanded by
the petitioner-accused. In support, he places r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.