SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 10477

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
MR JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY, J
SRI SURYANARAYANA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA BY – Respondent
CRL.P 3196/2024



Advocates:
SRI KALEEM SABIR, ADV. & SMT. K.P. YASHODHA, HCGP FOR R-1

A plea of alibi cannot be grounds for quashing criminal proceedings and must be proven at trial.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 143, 147, 427, 323, 504, 506, 447 R/w 149 - Quashing of proceedings - Accused sought to quash criminal proceedings claiming abuse of process and false allegations - Alibi presented for certain accused who were not present at the scene - Court held that plea of alibi cannot be a ground to quash proceedings and must be proved at trial - Petition dismissed. (Paras 1-5)

Facts of the case:
Accused Nos.1 to 15 challenged the proceedings in C.C.No.2541/2023, arising from Crime No.190/2022, alleging that they were falsely implicated in a case involving property damage and assault. The FIR was filed on 18.07.2022 based on a complaint of trespass and threats.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the plea of alibi cannot serve as a basis for quashing the proceedings, as it is a matter to be determined during the trial.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the allegations constituted an abuse of process of law and if the plea of alibi could quash the proceedings against the accused.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the plea of alibi does not warrant quashing of proceedings and must be substantiated in a trial setting, emphasizing that the investigation was complete and a charge sheet had been filed.

Result: Petition dismissed.

ORDER

Accused Nos.1 to 15 are before this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C , with a prayer to quash the entire proceedings in C.C.No.2541/2023 pending before the Court of Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Bangarpet arising out of Crime No.190/2022 registered by Bangarpet police station, KGF for the offence punishable under Sections 143 , 147, 427 , 323 504 , 506 & 447 R/w 149 of IPC .

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned HCGP for respondent No.1.

3. Learner counsel for the petitioners having reiterated the grounds urged in the petition submits that, criminal proceedings initiated against the petitioners is clear case of abuse of process of law. A false complaint has been filed making omnibus allegations against the petitioners. Some of the petitioners were not all present at the spot of the incident. He has placed reliance on certain documents and its pleads alibi. He submits that in view of documents at Annexures D to H, it is very clear that accused Nos.3, 7, 8, 9 and 14 were not present in the spot. He submits that accused No.15 is a aged lady and she is suffering from age old ailments.

4. Per contra learned HCGP opposed the petition.

She submits that on the ground of alibi the proceedings cannot be quashed. Investigation is complete and charge sheet has been filed against all accused for the aforesaid offences. Accordingly, she prays to dismiss the petition.

5. FIR in Crime No.190/2022 was registered by Bangarpet Police Station, KGF against the petitioners for the aforesaid offences on the basis of first information received from B Eshwar Singh on 18.07.2022. It is alleged that on 17.07.2022, accused persons named in the FIR had trespassed into the property of the first informant in respect of which there was a civil dispute and had damaged the property.

When the first informant questioned the same, the accused persons abused and assaulted him and also threatened him with dire consequences to his life. It is in this background, he had approached the police. After the investigation, the police have filed charge sheet as against the accused persons for the alleged offences. CWs.2, 3 and 4 are witnesses to the incident in question. The plea of alibi cannot be a ground to quash the proceedings and same can only be a defence which is required to be proved by the accused during the course of trial. Therefore, the prayer made by the petitioners cannot be granted. Under the circumstances, I am of the opinion that the petition is liable to be dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top