SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 11031

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA

R.F.A. NO. 292/2004(RES)

BETWEEN

LATE M BALAKRISHNA RAO

(SINCE DECEASED ON 07.04.2015 BY LR'S)

1(a) SMT.ANURADHA B RAO

W/O LATE M.BALAKRISHNA RAO

70 YEARS, R/AT 5K(WW) FERNHILL GARDEN

46TH RING ROAD HSR LAYOUT

6TH SECTOR BBMP

BANGALORE - 560 034

1(b) SMT.GAYATHRI RAO

D/O LATE M.BALAKRISHNA RAO

AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

5-WW FERNHILL GARDEN

46TH RING ROAD HSR LAYOUT

6TH SECTOR BBMP

BANGALORE - 560 034

1(c) SHRI GANESH RAO

S/O LATE BALAKRISHNA RAO

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

46TH RING ROAD, HSR LAYOUT

6TH SECTOR BBMP

BANGALORE - 560 034.

...APPELLANTS

(BY SRI DHANANJAY JOSHI, SR. ADV.A/W SRI SHISHIRA

AMARNATH AND SRI VACHAN H.U, ADVOCATES)

2

AND

1 .

SMT.PRAMODHA R BHAT

W/O RAGHAVENDRA BHAT

AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS

93, PRASHANTHA BHATLA

CHEMBUR, MUMBAI 71

2 .

SMT.JAYANTHI M BHAT

W/O P MOHAN BHAT

(SINCE DECEASED ON 24.12.2004)

BY LRS.,

2(a) PULIKALA MOHAN BHAT

S/O PULIKALA NARAYAN BHAT

AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS

R/AT 2674, G1 BRIGADE RETREAT

ADI PAMPA ROAD, V.V.MOHALLA

MYSURU - 570 002

2(b) PULIKALA MURALIDHAR BHAT

S/O PULIKALA MOHAN BHAT

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

R/AT 2674, G1 BRIGADE RETREAT

ADI PAMPA ROAD, V.V.MOHALLA

MYSURU -570 002

2(c) PULIKALA MANOHAR BHAT

S/O PULIKALA MOHAN BHAT

AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

R/AT 2674, G1 BRIGADE RETREAT

ADI PAMPA ROAD, V.V.MOHALLA

MYSURU - 570 002

3.

SMT.VASANTHI S BHAT

S/O P SACHIDANANDA BHAT

AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS

IPSHITHA NEAR M.S. MEDICALS,

3

OPPOSITE AMBEDKAR MEDICAL COLLEGE,

KAVALABYRASANDRA

BANGALORE - 560 032

4 .

SRI M CHANDRASHEKAR RAO

S/O LATE VISHWANATHA RAO

AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

NEAR BHAT'S NURSING HOME

7TH CROSS, GANDHI NAGAR

MANGALORE -575 003

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SMT.SUMA KEDILAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2(A-C)

AND R3 TO R4)

THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE

DECREE

DT.29.11.03

PASSED

IN

O.S.NO.23/97 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. DISTRICT

JUDGE,

D.K.,

MANGALORE,

DISMISSING

THE

SUIT

SEEKING AN ORDER FOR GRANT OF PROBATE.

THIS APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED

FOR JUDGMENT ON 25.11.2022, COMING ON FOR

'PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT', THIS DAY THE COURT

DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-

JUDGMENT

1.

The present appeal is directed against the

judgment and decree dated 29.11.2003 passed in OS

No.23/1997, on the file of the III Addl. District Judge,

Dakshina Kannada, Mangaluru.

4

2.

Parties

are

referred

to

as

plaintiff/s

and

defendants for the sake of convenience, as per their

original rankings before the Trial Court.

3.

Brief factual matrix for the disposal of the appeal

are as under:

A petition came to be filed by the plaintiff in P & SC

No.39/1997 seeking grant of probate in respect of the

registered Will of late M. Vishwanatha Rao dated 9.6.1992

registered in the Sub-Registrar's Office of Mangaluru Taluk.

It is further contended that the said Will is the last Will or

testament of M.Vishwanatha Rao when he was in sound

state of mind and body.

4.

After issuance of Notice, since there was a

contest by the respondents, by order dated 30.07.1997

the said P & SC petition filed under the provisions of the

Hindu Succession Act, 1956 came to be converted into

suit. Plaintiff further contended that plaintiff's father had

good and sufficient reasons to bequeath the major portion

of the estate to the plaintiff. Plaintiff's father was

5

employed as Sanitarty Inspector in Mangalore Municipality

and he retired in the year 1963. He did not have the

benefit of pension and also did not have substantial

savings. 4th defendant who was a 8th standard school drop

out, was employed in the year 1969-70 and was not in a

position to support the financial needs of the plaintiff's

father, as he was drawing only salary of Rs.400/- per

month. Subsequently, 4th defendant was no doubt

employed in Syndicate Bank, there again, the salary

earned by the 4th defendant was hardly sufficient to meet

the financial needs of the father of the plaintiff. Plaintiff

was in service outside Mangalore and he was supporting

his father financially by periodical payment of money

through cheques and drafts. Plaintiff provided his parents

the comfort of life by providing additional ceiling fan, a

pump set to lift the water from the well, constructing a

overhead tank and plumbing for water supply, providing

Television set, sofa, refrigerator and dining table.

6

5.

It is further contended that plaintiff's father in

order to meet the financial requirements, mortgaged the

house to meet the marriage expenses of the 2nd defendant

and the mortgage was discharged by the plaintiff. It is

also contended that to meet the marriage expenses of the

3rd defendant, plaintiff's father obtained loan from Janata

Bank and the loan was repaid by the plaintiff. It is further

contended that plaintiff's mother during her fag end of life,

had illness and she was treated in Manipal and Vijaya

Clinic, Mangalore and the plaintiff met all those expenses.

It is further contended that Vishwanatha Rao being a

Hindu, after the death, survived by the plaintiff and the

defendants herein, who are his children. His wife Smt.

Kamala pre-deceased him on 7.3.1990. Plaintiff has also

furnished the assets that has come to the hands of the

plaintiff in suit ‘A’ schedule to the plaint and undertakes

that he is ready to disclose full and true inventory thereof

and ready to furnish those details within six months from

the date of grant of probate and sought for allowing the

suit.

7

6.

Upon

service

of

suit

summons,

all

the

defendants appeared before the Court and 4th defendant

filed written statement contending the claim of the

plaintiff. The 4th defendant admitted that P & SC No.39/97

is filed for the grant of probate but he has objected for the

same and therefore, the probate petition is converted into

Original Suit. It is further contended that M. Vishwanatha

Rao was aged 8

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top