1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. SRISHANANDA
R.F.A. NO. 292/2004(RES)
BETWEEN
LATE M BALAKRISHNA RAO
(SINCE DECEASED ON 07.04.2015 BY LR'S)
1(a) SMT.ANURADHA B RAO
W/O LATE M.BALAKRISHNA RAO
70 YEARS, R/AT 5K(WW) FERNHILL GARDEN
46TH RING ROAD HSR LAYOUT
6TH SECTOR BBMP
BANGALORE - 560 034
1(b) SMT.GAYATHRI RAO
D/O LATE M.BALAKRISHNA RAO
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
5-WW FERNHILL GARDEN
46TH RING ROAD HSR LAYOUT
6TH SECTOR BBMP
BANGALORE - 560 034
1(c) SHRI GANESH RAO
S/O LATE BALAKRISHNA RAO
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
46TH RING ROAD, HSR LAYOUT
6TH SECTOR BBMP
BANGALORE - 560 034.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI DHANANJAY JOSHI, SR. ADV.A/W SRI SHISHIRA
AMARNATH AND SRI VACHAN H.U, ADVOCATES)
2
AND
1 .
SMT.PRAMODHA R BHAT
W/O RAGHAVENDRA BHAT
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
93, PRASHANTHA BHATLA
CHEMBUR, MUMBAI 71
2 .
SMT.JAYANTHI M BHAT
W/O P MOHAN BHAT
(SINCE DECEASED ON 24.12.2004)
BY LRS.,
2(a) PULIKALA MOHAN BHAT
S/O PULIKALA NARAYAN BHAT
AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS
R/AT 2674, G1 BRIGADE RETREAT
ADI PAMPA ROAD, V.V.MOHALLA
MYSURU - 570 002
2(b) PULIKALA MURALIDHAR BHAT
S/O PULIKALA MOHAN BHAT
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/AT 2674, G1 BRIGADE RETREAT
ADI PAMPA ROAD, V.V.MOHALLA
MYSURU -570 002
2(c) PULIKALA MANOHAR BHAT
S/O PULIKALA MOHAN BHAT
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
R/AT 2674, G1 BRIGADE RETREAT
ADI PAMPA ROAD, V.V.MOHALLA
MYSURU - 570 002
3.
SMT.VASANTHI S BHAT
S/O P SACHIDANANDA BHAT
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
IPSHITHA NEAR M.S. MEDICALS,
3
OPPOSITE AMBEDKAR MEDICAL COLLEGE,
KAVALABYRASANDRA
BANGALORE - 560 032
4 .
SRI M CHANDRASHEKAR RAO
S/O LATE VISHWANATHA RAO
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
NEAR BHAT'S NURSING HOME
7TH CROSS, GANDHI NAGAR
MANGALORE -575 003
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.SUMA KEDILAYA, ADVOCATE FOR R1, R2(A-C)
AND R3 TO R4)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE
DECREE
DT.29.11.03
PASSED
IN
O.S.NO.23/97 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. DISTRICT
JUDGE,
D.K.,
MANGALORE,
DISMISSING
THE
SUIT
SEEKING AN ORDER FOR GRANT OF PROBATE.
THIS APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED
FOR JUDGMENT ON 25.11.2022, COMING ON FOR
'PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGMENT', THIS DAY THE COURT
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
JUDGMENT
1.
The present appeal is directed against the
judgment and decree dated 29.11.2003 passed in OS
No.23/1997, on the file of the III Addl. District Judge,
Dakshina Kannada, Mangaluru.
4
2.
Parties
are
referred
to
as
plaintiff/s
and
defendants for the sake of convenience, as per their
original rankings before the Trial Court.
3.
Brief factual matrix for the disposal of the appeal
are as under:
A petition came to be filed by the plaintiff in P & SC
No.39/1997 seeking grant of probate in respect of the
registered Will of late M. Vishwanatha Rao dated 9.6.1992
registered in the Sub-Registrar's Office of Mangaluru Taluk.
It is further contended that the said Will is the last Will or
testament of M.Vishwanatha Rao when he was in sound
state of mind and body.
4.
After issuance of Notice, since there was a
contest by the respondents, by order dated 30.07.1997
the said P & SC petition filed under the provisions of the
Hindu Succession Act, 1956 came to be converted into
suit. Plaintiff further contended that plaintiff's father had
good and sufficient reasons to bequeath the major portion
of the estate to the plaintiff. Plaintiff's father was
5
employed as Sanitarty Inspector in Mangalore Municipality
and he retired in the year 1963. He did not have the
benefit of pension and also did not have substantial
savings. 4th defendant who was a 8th standard school drop
out, was employed in the year 1969-70 and was not in a
position to support the financial needs of the plaintiff's
father, as he was drawing only salary of Rs.400/- per
month. Subsequently, 4th defendant was no doubt
employed in Syndicate Bank, there again, the salary
earned by the 4th defendant was hardly sufficient to meet
the financial needs of the father of the plaintiff. Plaintiff
was in service outside Mangalore and he was supporting
his father financially by periodical payment of money
through cheques and drafts. Plaintiff provided his parents
the comfort of life by providing additional ceiling fan, a
pump set to lift the water from the well, constructing a
overhead tank and plumbing for water supply, providing
Television set, sofa, refrigerator and dining table.
6
5.
It is further contended that plaintiff's father in
order to meet the financial requirements, mortgaged the
house to meet the marriage expenses of the 2nd defendant
and the mortgage was discharged by the plaintiff. It is
also contended that to meet the marriage expenses of the
3rd defendant, plaintiff's father obtained loan from Janata
Bank and the loan was repaid by the plaintiff. It is further
contended that plaintiff's mother during her fag end of life,
had illness and she was treated in Manipal and Vijaya
Clinic, Mangalore and the plaintiff met all those expenses.
It is further contended that Vishwanatha Rao being a
Hindu, after the death, survived by the plaintiff and the
defendants herein, who are his children. His wife Smt.
Kamala pre-deceased him on 7.3.1990. Plaintiff has also
furnished the assets that has come to the hands of the
plaintiff in suit ‘A’ schedule to the plaint and undertakes
that he is ready to disclose full and true inventory thereof
and ready to furnish those details within six months from
the date of grant of probate and sought for allowing the
suit.
7
6.
Upon
service
of
suit
summons,
all
the
defendants appeared before the Court and 4th defendant
filed written statement contending the claim of the
plaintiff. The 4th defendant admitted that P & SC No.39/97
is filed for the grant of probate but he has objected for the
same and therefore, the probate petition is converted into
Original Suit. It is further contended that M. Vishwanatha
Rao was aged 8
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.