SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 10700

PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SRI.CHIKKANNA@PREM – Appellant
Versus
SRINIVASA – Respondent


1.

This revision petition is filed by the accused

under Section 397 r/w. 401 of Cr.P.C. challenging

judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated

22.09.2018 passed by the Court of Small Causes and XXVI

ACMM, Bengaluru, in CC No.15892/2017 and confirmed by

the LII Additional City and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in

Criminal

Appeal

No.2110/2018

vide

judgment

dated

30.08.2019.

2.

For the sake of convenience, the parties herein

are referred as per the original ranks occupied by them

before the trial Court.

3

3.

The brief factual matrix leading to the case are

that, the complainant-Sri. Srinivasa and accused-Sri.

Chikkanna are neighbourers. The accused approached the

complainant during the 4th week of September 2016 seeking

financial assistance of Rs.3.00 Lakhs for his urgent personal

requirements and in that regard, the accused issued a

post-dated cheque for Rs.3.00 Lakhs and when the

complainant presented the said cheque for encashment, it

was bounced for ‘Insufficient Funds’. The complainant then

got issued a legal notice, which is served on the accused.

The accused did not respond to the legal notice. Hence, the

complainant lodged a complaint.

4.

On the basis of the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top