PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SRI.CHIKKANNA@PREM – Appellant
Versus
SRINIVASA – Respondent
1.
This revision petition is filed by the accused
under Section 397 r/w. 401 of Cr.P.C. challenging
judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated
22.09.2018 passed by the Court of Small Causes and XXVI
ACMM, Bengaluru, in CC No.15892/2017 and confirmed by
the LII Additional City and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in
Criminal
Appeal
No.2110/2018
vide
judgment
dated
30.08.2019.
2.
For the sake of convenience, the parties herein
are referred as per the original ranks occupied by them
before the trial Court.
3
3.
The brief factual matrix leading to the case are
that, the complainant-Sri. Srinivasa and accused-Sri.
Chikkanna are neighbourers. The accused approached the
complainant during the 4th week of September 2016 seeking
financial assistance of Rs.3.00 Lakhs for his urgent personal
requirements and in that regard, the accused issued a
post-dated cheque for Rs.3.00 Lakhs and when the
complainant presented the said cheque for encashment, it
was bounced for ‘Insufficient Funds’. The complainant then
got issued a legal notice, which is served on the accused.
The accused did not respond to the legal notice. Hence, the
complainant lodged a complaint.
4.
On the basis of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.