Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR, J
JAYA POOJARY – Appellant
Versus
SMT SUMANA N – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. defendants' obstruction to agricultural activities led to plaintiff's application for temporary injunction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. plaintiff entitled to temporary injunction based on prima facie evidence of title and possession. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. court's discretion is upheld, emphasizing established legal principles for injunctions. (Para 4) |
| 4. overall judgment dismissing the petition, thereby confirming the lower court's decision. (Para 6) |
ORDER
2. A perusal of the material on record would indicate that the respondent – plaintiff instituted the aforesaid suit against the petitioners – defendants for permanent injunction and other reliefs in relation to the suit schedule immovable property. Along with the suit, the respondent – plaintiff filed an application for temporary injunction, the same was contested by the petitioners – defendants and was allowed by the trial Court vide impugned order dated 21.08.2023. Said order was challenged by the petitioners – defendants by way of an appeal in M.A. No. 25/2023 which was dismissed by the first appellate Court vide order dated 12.02.2024 which is assailed in the present petition.
4. It is also pertinent to note that while coming at th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
