Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
R. NATARAJ, J
V NARAYANAN – Appellant
Versus
SOORYANARAYAAN BHAT – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to conviction for dishonour of cheque. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. trial court upheld conviction based on presented evidence. (Para 4 , 5 , 8) |
| 3. jurisdiction arguments based on cheque issuance location. (Para 10 , 16) |
| 4. ratio on jurisdiction affirmed under ni act. (Para 12 , 14 , 15) |
ORDER
The petitioner has challenged the judgment of conviction dated 24.11.2011 passed by the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Madikeri, in C.C.No.831/2005 (henceforth 'Trial Court' for short) for the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (henceforth 'NI Act' for short) and the order of sentence to pay fine of Rs.3,55,000/-. The petitioner, has assailed the judgment dated 24.12.2012 passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Kodagu, Madikeri (henceforth 'Appellate Court' for short) in Crl.A.No.46/2011, by which judgment of conviction passed by the trial Court was upheld.
2. The parties shall henceforth referred as they were ranked before the Trial Court. The petitioner was the accused while the respondent was the complainant.
3. The private complaint filed by the complainant in PCR No.6/2005 which was registered as CC No.831/2005, discloses that the a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
