BENCH AT DHARWAD
CHARANJIT SINGH ANAND S/O SWINDER SINGH ANAND – Appellant
Versus
MALLIKARJUN S/O NINGAPPA GORAVI – Respondent
Appellant/complainant feeling aggrieved by judgment of
acquittal passed by Prl. Civil Judge and JMFC, Hubballi, in
C.C.No.1308/2012 dated 13.06.2018 preferred this appeal.
2.
The trial Court by its judgment dated 30.12.2015
convicted the accused and imposed sentence as per order of
sentence. Accused feeling aggrieved by the said judgment of
conviction and order of sentence preferred appeal before the
first Appellate court in Crl.A.No.17/2016. The first Appellate
Court by its judgment dated 27.01.2018 allowed the appeal in
part and remanded the case to trial Court to re-examine the
documents Exs.P.5, 12 and 13 and also for ascertaining
compensation. It is after remand the trial Court by impugned
judgment acquitted the case.
3.
Parties to the appeal are referred with their ranks as
assigned in the trial Court for the sake of convenience.
4.
The
factual
matrix
leading
to
the
case
of
prosecution can be stated in nutshell to the effect that
- 3 -
complainant is a proprietor of Karnataka Automotive situated at
Harbachan complex, Deshpande nagar, Hubballi, being the sole
distributor for Bharat Springs. Accused is known to complainant
being the businessman and good friend. Complain
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.