SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 17691

- 1 -

CRL.A No. 1308 of 2011

C/w. CRL.A. No. 1318 of 2011

CRL.A No. 1305 of 2011

CRL.A No. 1307 of 2011

CRL.A No. 30 of 2012

CRL.A No. 246 of 2012

CRL.A.NO.431/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MAY, 2023

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.NATARAJAN

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1308 OF 2011

C/W

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1318 OF 2011,

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1305 OF 2011,

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1307 OF 2011,

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 30 OF 2012,

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 246 OF 2012,

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 431 OF 2012

IN CRL.A. NO. 1308/2011

BETWEEN:

1.

SRINIVASA @ SRINATH

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

S/O THIMMARAYAPPA

2.

SATHEESH

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

S/O NARAYANAPPA

3.

THIPPESWAMY @ THIPPESH

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

S/O RAMACHANDRAPPA

ALL ARE R/AT SIDDAPURA

MADHUGIRI TALUK

TUMKUR DIST572101.

…APPELLANTS

Digitally signed by

VEDAVATHI A K

Location: High

Court of Karnataka

- 2 -

CRL.A No. 1308 of 2011

C/w. CRL.A. No. 1318 of 2011

CRL.A No. 1305 of 2011

CRL.A No. 1307 of 2011

CRL.A No. 30 of 2012

CRL.A No. 246 of 2012

CRL.A.NO.431/2012

(BY SRI. G NARASI REDDY.,ADVOCATE FOR A1 AND A3;

SRI. CHETHAN B., ADVOCATE FOR R2)

AND:

STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,

KORATAGERE POLICE STATION,

TUMKUR DIST- 572101.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI.B.J. ROHITH, HCGP)

THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.374(2) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET

ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 2.12.2011 PASSED BY THE

I ADDL. DIST. AND S.J. TUMKUR IN SPL.C.NO.85/2006-CONVICTING

THE APPELLANTS/ACCUSED NOS.2 TO 4 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S

136 OF ELECTRICITY ACT. 2003.THE APPELLANTS/ACCUSED ARE

SENTENCED TO UNDERGO R.I. FOR THREE YEARS AND PAY A FINE

OF RS.5,000/- EACH, IN DEFAULT OF PAYMENT OF FINE THEY SHALL

UNDERGO R.I. FOR SIX MONTHS-FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 136 OF

ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003.

IN CRL.A NO. 1318/2011

BETWEEN:

1.

SRINIVASA @ SRINATH

S/O.THIMMARAYAPPA

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

R/AT.SIDDAPURA,

KASABA HOBLI

MADHUGIRI TALUK

TUMKUR DISTRICT.

2.

THIPPESHI @ THIPPESWAMY

S/O.RAMACHANDRAPPA

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

R/AT.SIDDAPURA,

- 3 -

CRL.A No. 1308 of 2011

C/w. CRL.A. No. 1318 of 2011

CRL.A No. 1305 of 2011

CRL.A No. 1307 of 2011

CRL.A No. 30 of 2012

CRL.A No. 246 of 2012

CRL.A.NO.431/2012

KASABA HOBLI

MADHUGIRI TALUK

TUMKUR DISTRICT.

3.

GOPALA

S/O.LATE ERANNA

AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS

R/AT.HAVINAMADUGU

DODDERI HOBLI,

MADHUGIRI TALUK

TUMKUR DISTRICT.

…APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. G NARASI REDDY.,ADVOCATE)

AND:

STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER

MADHUGIRI POLICE STATION

TUMKUR DISTRICT 572 101.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. B.J. ROHITH., HCGP FOR R1)

THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.374(2) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET

ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 9.12.2011 PASSED BY THE

I ADDL. DIST. AND S.J. TUMKUR IN SPL.C.NO.64/2006-CONVICTING

THE APPELLANTS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 3 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S

136

AND

137

OF

ELECTRICITY

ACT,

2003.THE

APPELLANTS/ACCUSED ARE SENTENCED TO UNDERGO R.I. FOR ONE

YEAR AND PAY A FINE OF RS.1,000/- EACH ANDR.I. FOR ONE YEAR

AND PAY A FINE OF RS.2,000/- EACH, IN DEFAULT OF PAYMENT OF

FINE THEY SHALL UNDERGO IMPRISONMENT FOR THREE MONTHS-

FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 136 AND 137 OF ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003.

- 4 -

CRL.A No. 1308 of 2011

C/w. CRL.A. No. 1318 of 2011

CRL.A No. 1305 of 2011

CRL.A No. 1307 of 2011

CRL.A No. 30 of 2012

CRL.A No. 246 of 2012

CRL.A.NO.431/2012

IN CRL.A NO. 1305/2011

BETWEEN:

1.

SRINIVASA @ SRINATH

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

S/O THIMMARAYAPPA

2.

SATHEESH

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

S/O NARAYANAPPA

3.

THIPPESWAMY @ THIPPESH

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

S/O RAMACHANDRAPPA

ALL ARE R/AT SIDDAPURA

MADHUGIRI TALUK

TUMKUR DIST-572101.

…APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. G NARASI REDDY.,ADVOCATE FOR A1 AND A3;

SRI. CHETHAN B, ADVOCATE FOR A2)

AND:

STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY THE STATION HOUSEOFFICER,

KORATAGERE POLICE STATION,

TUMKUR DIST- 572101.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI.B.J. ROHITH, HCGP)

THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.374(2) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET

ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 2.12.2011 PASSED BY THE

I ADDL. DIST. AND S.J. TUMKUR IN SPL.C.NO.80/2006-CONVICTING

THE APPELLANTS/ACCUSED NOS.2 TO 4 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S

136

OF

ELECTRICITY

ACT.THE

APPELLANTS/ACCUSED

ARE

SENTENCED TO UNDERGO R.I. FOR THREE YEARS AND PAY A FINE

- 5 -

CRL.A No. 1308 of 2011

C/w. CRL.A. No. 1318 of 2011

CRL.A No. 1305 of 2011

CRL.A No. 1307 of 2011

CRL.A No. 30 of 2012

CRL.A No. 246 of 2012

CRL.A.NO.431/2012

OF RS.5,000/- EACH, IN DEFAULT OF PAYMENT OF FINE THEY SHALL

UNDERGO R.I. FOR SIX MONTHS-FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 136 OF

ELECTRICITY ACT.

IN CRL.A.NO. 1307/2011

BETWEEN:

1.

SRINIVASA @ SRINATH

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

S/O THIMMARAYAPPA

2.

SATHEESH

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

S/O NARAYANAPPA

3.

THIPPESWAMY @ THIPPESH

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

S/O RAMACHANDRAPPA

ALL ARE R/AT SIDDAPURA

MADHUGIRI TALUK

TUMKUR DIST-572101.

…APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. G NARASI REDDY.,ADVOCATE FOR A1 & A3;

SRI. CHETHAN B, ADVOCATE FOR A2)

AND:

STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,

KORATAGERE, POLICE STATION,

TUMKUR DIST- 572101.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. B.J. ROHITH., HCGP)

THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.374(2) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET

ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 2.12.2011 PASSED BY THE

- 6 -

CRL.A No. 1308 of 2011

C/w. CRL.A. No. 1318 of 2011

CRL.A No. 1305 of 2011

CRL.A No. 1307 of 2011

CRL.A No. 30 of 2012

CRL.A No. 246 of 2012

CRL.A.NO.431/2012

I ADDL. DIST. AND S.J. TUMKUR IN SPL.C.NO.84/2006-CONVICTING

THE APPELLANTS/ACCUSED NOS.2 TO 4 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S

136

OF

ELECTRICITY

ACT.THE

APPELLANTS/ACCUSED

ARE

SENTENCED TO UNDERGO R.I. FOR THREE YEARS AND PAY A FINE

OF RS.5,000/- EACH, IN DEFAULT OF PAYMENT OF FINE THEY SHALL

UNDERGO R.I. FOR SIX MONTHS-FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 136 OF

ELECTRICITY ACT.

IN CRL.A NO.30/2012

BETWEEN:

SYED FAROOQ PASHA

S/O SYED MUQBIL

AGED ABOUT 26 YERS,

R /AT NO.17, E STREET,

GOPALPURA,

BENGALURU 560023

…APPELLANT

(BY SRI. A S KULKARNI.,ADVOCATE FOR A1 TO A3)

AND:

STATE BY MADHUGIRI

POLICE STATION,

TUMKUR DISTRICT.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. B.J. ROHITH., HCGP)

THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.374(2) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET

ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 9.12.11 PASSED BY THE I ADDL. DIST.,

AND

S.J.,

TUMKUR

IN

SPL.C.NO.64/06

-

CONVICTING

THE

APPELLANT/ACCUSED FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 136 AND 137 OF

ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003.

- 7 -

CRL.A No. 1308 of 2011

C/w. CRL.A. No. 1318 of 2011

CRL.A No. 1305 of 2011

CRL.A No. 1307 of 2011

CRL.A No. 30 of 2012

CRL.A No. 246 of 2012

CRL.A.NO.431/2012

IN CRL.A. NO. 246/2012

BETWEEN:

1.

SRINIVASA @ SRINATH

S/O THIMMARAYANAPPA

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

2.

SATHEESHA

S/O NARAYANAPPA

AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS

3.

THIPPESHA @ THIPPESWAMY

S/O RAMACHANDRAPPA

AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS

R/AT SIDDAPURA

KASABA HOBLI

MADHUGIRI TALUK

TUMKUR DISTRICT.

…APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. G NARASI REDDY.,ADVOCATE FOR A1 AND A3;

SRI. CHETHAN B., ADVOCATE FOR A2)

AND:

STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY SHO KORATAGERE P S

TUMKUR DISTRICT-572101

REP. BY GOVT PLEADER

HIGH COURT BUILDINGS

BANGALORE CITY.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI.B.J. ROHITH., HCGP)

THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.374(2) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET

ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 1.2.12 PASSED BY THE I ADDL.DIST.,

AND

S.J.,

TUMKUR

IN

SPL.C.NO.82/06

-

CONVICTING

THE

- 8 -

CRL.A No. 1308 of 2011

C/w. CRL.A. No. 1318 of 2011

CRL.A No. 1305 of 2011

CRL.A No. 1307 of 2011

CRL.A No. 30 of 2012

CRL.A No. 246 of 2012

CRL.A.NO.431/2012

APPELLANTS/ACCUSED

FOR

THE

OFFENCE

P/U/S

136

OF

ELECTRICTIY ACT, 2003. AND THE APPELLANTS/ACCUSED NOS.2,3 &

4 ARE SENTENCED TO SUFFER R.I. FOR ONE YEAR AND TO PAY A

FINE OF RS.3,000/- EACH AND IN DEFAULT TO PAY THE FINE

AMOUNT, TO SUFFER R.I. FOR SIX MONTHS FOR THE OFFENCE

P/U/S 136 OF ELECTRICITY ACT.

IN CRL.A. 431/2012

BETWEEN:

1.

SRINIVASA @ SRINATH

S/O THIMMARAYAPPA

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

2.

SATHEESH

S/O NARAYANAPPA

AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS

3.

THIPPESWAMY @ THIPPESHA

S/O RAMACHANDRAPPA

AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS

ALL ARE R/AT SIDDAPURA

MADHUGIRI TALUK

TUMKUR DISTRICT-572101.

…APPELLANTS

(BY SRI. G NARASI REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR A1&3;

SRI. CHETHAN B., ADVOCATE FOR A2)

AND:

STATE OF KARNATAKA

BY THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER

KORATAGERE POLICE STATION

TUMKUR DISTRICT-572101.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. B.J. ROHITH., HCGP)

- 9 -

CRL.A No. 1308 of 2011

C/w. CRL.A. No. 1318 of 2011

CRL.A No. 1305 of 2011

CRL.A No. 1307 of 2011

CRL.A No. 30 of 2012

CRL.A No. 246 of 2012

CRL.A.NO.431/2012

THIS CRL.A. FILED U/S.374(2) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET

ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED:2.3.2012 PASSED BY THE

I

ADDL.DISTRICT

AND

SJ

TUMKUR,

IN

SPL.C.NO.81/2006-

CONVICTING THE APPELLANTS/ACCUSED NOS.2 TO 4 FOR THE

OFFENCE

P/U/S.136

OF

ELECTRICTIY

ACT,

2003

AND

THE

APPELLANTS/ACCUSED NOS.2 TO 4 ARE SENTENCED TO SUFFER RI

FOR 1 YEAR AND TO PAY A FINE OF RS.1,000/- EACH AND IN

DEFAULT TO PAY IT, TO SUFFER IMPRISONMENT FOR THREE

MONTHS, FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.136 OF ELECTRICITY ACT.

THESE APPEALS, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, THE

COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

These appeals are filed by the appellants/accused persons

under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure for setting

aside the judgments of conviction and orders of sentence

passed by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Tumkur

in Spl. Case Nos.85/2006, 65/2006, 80/2006, 84/2006,

64/2006, 82/2006 and 81/2006 respectively whereby, the trial

Court has convicted the appellants for the offences punishable

under Section 136 of the Electricity Act 2003 and sentenced the

accused

in

Crl.A.No.1308/2011

to

undergo

rigorous

imprisonment for three years and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/-

each and in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six

- 10 -

months; the accused in Crl.A.No.1318/2011 to undergo

rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of

Rs.1000/- and rigorous imprisonment for one year and pay fine

of Rs.2,000/, in default, they shall undergo imprisonment for

three months; the accused in Crl.A.No.1305/2011 to undergo

rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay fine of

Rs.5,000/- and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for

six months; the accused in Crl.A.No.1307/2011 to undergo

rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay fine of

Rs.5,000/- and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for

six months; the accused in Crl.A.No.30/2012 to undergo

rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of

Rs.1000/- and rigorous imprisonment for one year and pay fine

of Rs.2,000/, in default, they shall undergo imprisonment for

three months; the accused in Crl.A.No.246/2012 to undergo

rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of

Rs.3,000/-

each

and

in

default,

they

shall

undergo

imprisonment

for

six

months

and

the

accused

in

Crl.A.No.431/2012 to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one

- 11 -

years and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- and in default to

imprisonment for three months.

Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and

the learned High Court Government Pleader for the State-

respondent.

Since these appeals arise out of a common set of

facts and the accused persons have involved in the same

offence. Hence, all the appeals are taken up together for final

disposal. For the purpose of convenience, hereinafter the

appellants are referred to as accused persons.

4.

The case of the prosecution is that the complainant

in these cases has lodged a compliant against unknown persons

stating that there was theft of electricity copper/aluminum

wires measuring 675 meters, 1680 meters, 2560 meters, 600

meters, 1680 meters 220 meters and 480 meters respectively.

After registering the case against the unknown persons by

Koratagere and Madhugiri police and during investigation the

police have arrested the accused persons and recorded their

- 12 -

voluntarily statements. In their voluntarily statements the

accused persons have revealed that they have stolen the wires

and sold to one Atavulla. Based on the voluntarily statements,

the police seized copper ingots from Athaullah measuring

different kgs. The accused persons have been sent to judicial

custody and released on bail. The police after investigation

filed charge sheet against the accused persons. They have

pleaded not guilty but claimed to be tried.

5.

The prosecution, in all, examined 17 witnesses as

PWs.1 to 17 and 17 documents have been marked as Exs.P.1

to P.17 and one object has been marked as MO.1 in

Crl.A.No.1308/2011; 15 witnesses as PWs.1 to 15 and 15

documents have been marked as Exs.P.1 to P.15 and 8 objects

have been marked as MOs.1 and 8 in Crl.A.No.1318/2011; 12

witnesses as PWs.1 to 12 and 10 documents have been marked

as Exs.P.1 to P.10 and 1 object has been marked as MO.1 in

Crl.A.No.1305/2011; 12 witnesses as PWs.1 to 12 and 13

documents have been marked as Exs.P.1 to P.13 and 1 object

has been marked as MO.1 Crl.A.No.1307/2011; 15 witnesses

- 13 -

as PWs.1 to 15 and 15 documents have been marked as

Exs.P.1 to P.15 and 8 objects have been marked as MOs.1

Crl.A.No.30/2012 and 8; 10 witnesses as PWs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top