- 1 -
NC: 2023:KHC-K:4576
CRL.P.No.200629 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
KALABURAGI BENCH
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200629 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
1.
DR. PARAMVIRSINGH RAI
S/O JANG BAHADUR SINGH RAI
AGE: 47 YEARS OCC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER
R/O: GARHSHANKAR PANAM
HOSHIARPUR
PUNJAB-144532
2.
DR. AMIT AGGARWAL S/O SURINDARKUMAR GARG
AGE: 46 YEARS OCC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER
R/O: HOUSE NO.2019, CHOUDHARY PRATAP STREET
MALL ROAD NAI BASTI
BATHINDA-151001
PUNJAB STATE
3.
DR. YOGESHWAR SINGH GILL
S/O SARDAR RAJBIRSINGH GILL
AGE: 47 YEARS OCC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER
R/O: HOUSE NO.6 HEMA BHAG
NEAR MOTI BHAG, PATIALA
PUNJAB STATE-147001
4.
DR. UMESH AGNIHOTRI
S/O DR. GANESH DUTT AGNIHOTRI
AGE: 48 YEARS OCC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER
R/O: AGNIHOTRI EYE HOSPITAL
TAYAL GARDEN BARWALA ROAD,
HISAR-125001
HARYANA STATE
Digitally signed by
KHAJAAMEEN L
MALAGHAN
Location: HIGH COURT
OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2023:KHC-K:4576
CRL.P.No.200629 of 2023
5.
DR. HATINDER JEET SINGH SETHI
S/O DR. SARDAR ARJUNSINGH
AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER
R/O: F-102, DLF THE PRIMUS
SECTOR-82A, SIKANDERPUR
GURGAON
HARYANA-122004
6.
DR. SHAMSUNDAR SINGLA
S/O SATPAL SINGLA
AGE: 48 YEARS OCC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER
R/O: HOUSE NO.B-25/292
NETAJI NAGAR
SALEM TABRI
LUDHIANA-141001
PUNJAB STATE
7.
DR. JASBIRSINGH RANDHAWA
S/O KANWALJIT SINGH RANDHAWA
AGE: 48 YEARS OCC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER
R/O: HOUSE NO.103, SURAKSHA COLONY
PATHANKOT-145001
PUNJAB STATE
8.
SRI VISHAL GARG S/O KISHAN GOPAL GARG
AGE: 48 YEARS OCC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER
R/O: HOUSE NO.42, PHASE-3 MODEL TOWN,
BATHINDA
PUNJAB STATE-151001
…PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. S. S. MAMADAPUR, ADVOCATE)
AND:
- 3 -
NC: 2023:KHC-K:4576
CRL.P.No.200629 of 2023
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH THE PSI
APMC POLICE STATION
VIJAYAPURA
REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
ADVOCATE GENERAL'S OFFICE
HIGH COURT BUILDING
KALABURAGI-585102
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. GURURAJ V. HASILKAR, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482
OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS
IN C.C.NO.774/1996 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL.
CIVIL JUDGE (JR. DN) AND JFMC-I, VIJAYPUR.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
This petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is filed by
the petitioners - accused Nos.1, 2, 5 to 10, challenging the
proceedings in C.C.No.774/1996, on the file of the I
Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Dn) and JMFC-I, Vijayapur.
- 4 -
02. The summary of the charge-sheet is that, the
petitioners – accused herein by forming an unlawful
assembly and holding deadly weapons entered the room of
the complainant and assaulted him and one Anand.
03. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners –
accused herein and the learned High Court Government
Pleader for the respondent – State.
04. The learned Magistrate after accepting the
charge-sheet took cognizance for the aforesaid offences.
CW.1 the injured witness and the complainant did not
appear before the Trial Court to tender their evidence,
though sufficient opportunity was granted to them. The
Trial Court taking into account of the same, has closed the
side of prosecution to tender the evidence of CW.1. Except
the investigating officer – PW.10, none of the injured –
witnesses have been examined.
- 5 -
05. The petitioners - accused herein, CW.1 along
with Anand had filed an application under Section 320 of
Cr.P.C. for compounding the offences. However, the said
application came to be rejected on the ground that the
offences alleged are not non-compoundable.
06. The trial commenced in the year 1996 and since
the complainant and the injured witnesses did not subject
themselves to examine and also the accused having
absconded, the trial could not be concluded, at the
earliest. The petitioners – accused herein, CW.1 –
complainant and the injured witness namely Anand had
filed an application for compounding of the offences
stating that they have amicably settled the dispute.
07. In view of the preceding analysis, in my
considered view that, it would be a futile excise, if the
proceeding is continued, since the CW.1 – complainant
and the injured witness have not chosen to appear before
the Trial Court for their examination-in-chief. Hence, the
continuation of the criminal proceedings against the
- 6 -
petitioners - accused herein, will be an abuse of process of
law. Accordingly, I pass the following;
O R D E R
I.
The Criminal Petition is allowed.
II.
The impugned proceedings in C.C.No.774/1996
on the file of the I Additional Civil Judge (Jr.
Dn)
and
JMFC-1,
Vijayapura,
is
hereby
quashed.
In view disposal of main petition, the pending I.As. if
any do not survive for consideration and hence, they are
disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KJJ
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 69
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.