SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 18936

- 1 -

NC: 2023:KHC-K:4576

CRL.P.No.200629 of 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,

KALABURAGI BENCH

DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR

CRIMINAL PETITION NO.200629 OF 2023

BETWEEN:

1.

DR. PARAMVIRSINGH RAI

S/O JANG BAHADUR SINGH RAI

AGE: 47 YEARS OCC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER

R/O: GARHSHANKAR PANAM

HOSHIARPUR

PUNJAB-144532

2.

DR. AMIT AGGARWAL S/O SURINDARKUMAR GARG

AGE: 46 YEARS OCC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER

R/O: HOUSE NO.2019, CHOUDHARY PRATAP STREET

MALL ROAD NAI BASTI

BATHINDA-151001

PUNJAB STATE

3.

DR. YOGESHWAR SINGH GILL

S/O SARDAR RAJBIRSINGH GILL

AGE: 47 YEARS OCC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER

R/O: HOUSE NO.6 HEMA BHAG

NEAR MOTI BHAG, PATIALA

PUNJAB STATE-147001

4.

DR. UMESH AGNIHOTRI

S/O DR. GANESH DUTT AGNIHOTRI

AGE: 48 YEARS OCC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER

R/O: AGNIHOTRI EYE HOSPITAL

TAYAL GARDEN BARWALA ROAD,

HISAR-125001

HARYANA STATE

Digitally signed by

KHAJAAMEEN L

MALAGHAN

Location: HIGH COURT

OF KARNATAKA

- 2 -

NC: 2023:KHC-K:4576

CRL.P.No.200629 of 2023

5.

DR. HATINDER JEET SINGH SETHI

S/O DR. SARDAR ARJUNSINGH

AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER

R/O: F-102, DLF THE PRIMUS

SECTOR-82A, SIKANDERPUR

GURGAON

HARYANA-122004

6.

DR. SHAMSUNDAR SINGLA

S/O SATPAL SINGLA

AGE: 48 YEARS OCC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER

R/O: HOUSE NO.B-25/292

NETAJI NAGAR

SALEM TABRI

LUDHIANA-141001

PUNJAB STATE

7.

DR. JASBIRSINGH RANDHAWA

S/O KANWALJIT SINGH RANDHAWA

AGE: 48 YEARS OCC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER

R/O: HOUSE NO.103, SURAKSHA COLONY

PATHANKOT-145001

PUNJAB STATE

8.

SRI VISHAL GARG S/O KISHAN GOPAL GARG

AGE: 48 YEARS OCC: MEDICAL PRACTITIONER

R/O: HOUSE NO.42, PHASE-3 MODEL TOWN,

BATHINDA

PUNJAB STATE-151001

…PETITIONERS

(BY SRI. S. S. MAMADAPUR, ADVOCATE)

AND:

- 3 -

NC: 2023:KHC-K:4576

CRL.P.No.200629 of 2023

THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

THROUGH THE PSI

APMC POLICE STATION

VIJAYAPURA

REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

ADVOCATE GENERAL'S OFFICE

HIGH COURT BUILDING

KALABURAGI-585102

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. GURURAJ V. HASILKAR, HCGP)

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482

OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS

IN C.C.NO.774/1996 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDL.

CIVIL JUDGE (JR. DN) AND JFMC-I, VIJAYPUR.

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS

DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

This petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. is filed by

the petitioners - accused Nos.1, 2, 5 to 10, challenging the

proceedings in C.C.No.774/1996, on the file of the I

Additional Civil Judge (Jr. Dn) and JMFC-I, Vijayapur.

- 4 -

02. The summary of the charge-sheet is that, the

petitioners – accused herein by forming an unlawful

assembly and holding deadly weapons entered the room of

the complainant and assaulted him and one Anand.

03. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners –

accused herein and the learned High Court Government

Pleader for the respondent – State.

04. The learned Magistrate after accepting the

charge-sheet took cognizance for the aforesaid offences.

CW.1 the injured witness and the complainant did not

appear before the Trial Court to tender their evidence,

though sufficient opportunity was granted to them. The

Trial Court taking into account of the same, has closed the

side of prosecution to tender the evidence of CW.1. Except

the investigating officer – PW.10, none of the injured –

witnesses have been examined.

- 5 -

05. The petitioners - accused herein, CW.1 along

with Anand had filed an application under Section 320 of

Cr.P.C. for compounding the offences. However, the said

application came to be rejected on the ground that the

offences alleged are not non-compoundable.

06. The trial commenced in the year 1996 and since

the complainant and the injured witnesses did not subject

themselves to examine and also the accused having

absconded, the trial could not be concluded, at the

earliest. The petitioners – accused herein, CW.1 –

complainant and the injured witness namely Anand had

filed an application for compounding of the offences

stating that they have amicably settled the dispute.

07. In view of the preceding analysis, in my

considered view that, it would be a futile excise, if the

proceeding is continued, since the CW.1 – complainant

and the injured witness have not chosen to appear before

the Trial Court for their examination-in-chief. Hence, the

continuation of the criminal proceedings against the

- 6 -

petitioners - accused herein, will be an abuse of process of

law. Accordingly, I pass the following;

O R D E R

I.

The Criminal Petition is allowed.

II.

The impugned proceedings in C.C.No.774/1996

on the file of the I Additional Civil Judge (Jr.

Dn)

and

JMFC-1,

Vijayapura,

is

hereby

quashed.

In view disposal of main petition, the pending I.As. if

any do not survive for consideration and hence, they are

disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE

KJJ

List No.: 1 Sl No.: 69

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top