SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 18556

- 1 -

RFA No. 2006 of 2006

C/W RFA No. 2007 of 2006

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023

BEFORE

THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA

REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2006 OF 2006 (DEC)

C/W

REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2007 OF 2006

IN.R.F.A.No.2006/2006

BETWEEN:

1.

NARAHARIYAPPA

S/O LATE CHOODAMANIYAPPA

AGED 70 YEARS

SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS.

1(a) SMT RATHNAMMA W/O LATE K NARAHARIYAPPA

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,

OCC. HOUSEHOLD

1(b) SMT N SHANTHA D/O LATE K NARAHARIYAPPA

AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS

OCC TEACHER ,

1(c) N RAVI S/O LATE K NARAHARIYAPPA

AGED ABOUT 35YEARS

OCC BUSINESS ,

1(d) N GIRISH S/O LATE K NARAHARIYAPPA

AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS , OCC ADVOCATE ,

ALL ARE R/AT 3RD CROSS,

RAVINDRANAGAR, SHIMOGA.

(AMENDED AS PER THE ORDER OF THE HON’BLE

COURT DT: 06.08.2008)

…APPELLANTS

(BY SMT. RATHNAMMA, 1(a), SMT. SHANTHA, 1(b),

SRI.N RAVI, 1(c) AND SRI. N. GIRISH 1(d).,

APPELLANTS (ABSENT) )

Digitally

signed by

PANKAJA S

Location:

HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

- 2 -

RFA No. 2006 of 2006

C/W RFA No. 2007 of 2006

AND:

BELLUDI YELLAPPA

S/O SIDDAPPA

DEAD BY HIS LRS

1.

YALLAPPA S/O. LATE BELLUDI YELLAPPA

AGED ABOUT 42YEARS

2.

SIDDAPPA S/O LATE BELLUDI YELLAPPA

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS.

3.

NANJAPPA S/O. LATE BELLUDI YELLAPPA

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS.

4.

BARMAPPA S/O. LATE BELLUDI YELLAPPA

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS.

5.

MAHESH S/O. LATE BELLUDI YELLAPPA

AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS.

6.

NAGAPPA S/O. LATE BELLUDI YELLAPPA

AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS.

7.

UMESH S/O. LATE BELLUDI YELLAPPA

AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS.

8.

NINGARAJU S/O. LATE BELLUDI YELLAPPA

MINOR, REP BY COURT GUARDINA

ALL ARE AGRICULTURISTS

R/O. GADIKOPPA VILLAGE,

SHIMOGA TALUK.

…RESPONDENTS

(BY SRI. RAKSHIT SHETTY, FOR

SRI. P.S. RAJAGOPAL & ASSOCIATES, ADVOCATES)

- 3 -

RFA No. 2006 of 2006

C/W RFA No. 2007 of 2006

THIS RFA FILED U/S 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE

AND

DECREE

DT.30.06.2006

PASSED

IN

O.S.NO.268/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE

(SR.DN.) AND CJM., SHIMOGA, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR

DECLARATION AND CONSEQUENTIAL RELIEF OF PERMANENT

INJUNCTION.

IN.R.F.A.No.2007/2006

SINCE DIED BY HIS LRS.

OCC HOUSEHOLD

ALL ARE R/AT 3RD CROSS,

(AMENDED AS PER THE ORDER OF THE HON’BLE

COURT DT: 06.08.2008)

(BY SMT. RATHNAMMA, 1(a), SMT. SHANTHA, 1(b)

SRI.N RAVI, 1(C), SRI. N. GIRISH 1(d).,

- 4 -

DEAD BY HIS LRS.

A.

MT. BASAMMA W/O LATE BELLUDI YELLAPPA

MAJOR.

B

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS

C.

D.

E.

F.

G.

H.

I.

SMT. SUBADRAMMA W/O KRISHNAPPA

AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS

- 5 -

AGRICULRIST

R/O KAREHALLI VILLAGE

BHADRAVATHI TALUK

SHIMOGA DISTRICT – 577 201.

SMT. NAGUBAI W/O LATE RAMA RAO

AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS

AGRICULTURIST

R/O MIGHATTA

SHIMOGA – 577 201.

LR’S OF DECEASED RESPONDENT NO-3

3(a) SMT.LEELA

W/O KRISHNAMURTHY

AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS

MILGHATTA MAIN ROAD

SHIMOGGA.

3(b) SMT. USHA

W/O KENCHOJI RAO

D/O LATE. NAGU BAI

AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS

SHIKARIPURA,

SHIMOGGA DISTRICT.

(AMENDED AS PER THE ORDER DATED: 12.01.2010)

(BY SRI. RAKSHIT SHETTY, FOR SRI. P.S. RAJAGOPAL &

ASSOCIATES.,ADVOCATES FOR R-1 ( ATO C, E TO I) & R-2;

R-1(D) IS SERVED

SRI. C.T. PARAMESHWARAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R-3 (A&B))

JUDGEMENT

AND

DECREE

DT.30.06.2006

PASSED

IN

O.S.NO.01/1995 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE

(SR.DN.) AND CJM., SHIMOGA, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR

SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE.

THESE APPEALS, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,

THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

- 6 -

JUDGMENT

On

11.01.2023,

the

appellants’

counsel

was

permitted to retire since he had field Memo of Retirement.

Registry was directed to print the name of the

appellants in the cause list. Accordingly, names of the

appellants have been printed in the cause list.

Even on the last occasion, there was no appearance

on behalf of the appellants.

Today also, there is no appearance on behalf of the

appellants. It appears that the appellants are not

interested in prosecuting the appeals.

Left with no other alternatives, the appeals are

dismissed for non-prosecution.

Sd/-

JUDGE

BMC

List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top