SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 17619

- 1 -

NC: 2023:KHC:24719

CMP No. 100002 of 2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2023

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS

CIVIL MISC. PETITION NO. 100002 OF 2023

BETWEEN:

NIKITHA BUILD-TECH PRIVATE LIMITED

602, 6TH FLOOR, BRIGADE RUBIX ,

NO-20, CAMPUS, HMT MAIN ROAD,

YESHWANTHPUR, BENGALURU,

KARNATAKA - 560 022.

REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED

REPRESENTATIVE AND DIRECTOR

MR. RAJENDRA R. KULKARNI.

…PETITIONER

(BY SRI. S.B. DODDAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE)

AND:

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,

DISTRICT URBAN DEVELOPMENT CELL,

HAVERI DISTRICT,

HAVERI - 581 110.

…RESPONDENT

(BY SRI. SANTHOSH KUMAR M.B, HCGP)

THIS CIVIL MISC. PETITION UNDER SEC.11 (6) OF THE

ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT 1996, PRAYING To

APPOINT A SOLE ARBITRATOR IN CONSTITUTION OF THE

ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL AS PER THE CONTRACT FOR THE SPEEDY

Digitally signed

by JUANITA

THEJESWINI

Location: HIGH

COURT OF

KARNATAKA

- 2 -

NC: 2023:KHC:24719

CMP No. 100002 of 2023

RESOLUTION OF THE DISPUTES THAT HAVE ARISEN BETWEEN

THE PETITIONER AND THE RESPONDENT ARISING OUT THE

CONTRACT AGREEMENT DATED 27.03.2018 AS PER CLAUSE 24

ARTICLE 4 OF THE CONTANT PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND

ETC.,

THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,

THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

R.DEVDAS J., (ORAL):

This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section

11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking

appointment of a sole arbitrator to resolve the dispute between

the parties of the Contract Agreement dated 27.03.2018 at

Annexure-A.

2.

Learned

High

Court

Government

Pleader

appearing for the respondent-Deputy Commissioner was

requested to take instructions

as to whether the

respondent has any objection for appointment of an

Arbitrator by this Court. Learned High Court Government

Pleader submits on instructions that this Court may

proceed to appoint the Arbitrator. However, it is

- 3 -

requested that since the parties are at Dharwad, the

Arbitration may be held at Dharwad.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out

from the Arbitration clause contained in Clause 4 of the

Special Conditions of Contract dated 27.03.2018 at

Annexure-A that the parties have agreed that the

arbitration proceedings shall be held at Bangalore and not

at Dharawad.

4.

In that view of the matter, this Court proceeds

to pass the following:

ORDER

(a)

The

petition

is

allowed

appointing

Hon’ble Dr.Justice Jawad Rahim, Former

Judge, High Court of Karnataka, as the

sole arbitrator to enter reference of the

disputes between the petitioner and the

respondent and conduct proceeding at

the Arbitration and Conciliation Centre

(Domestic and International), Bengaluru

according to the Rules governing the said

Arbitration Centre.

- 4 -

(b)

All contentions inter se parties are left

open for adjudication in the arbitration

proceedings.

(c)

The office is directed to communicate this

order to the Arbitration and Conciliation

Centre and to Hon’ble Dr.Justice Sri.

Jawad Rahim, Former Judge, High Court

of Karnataka, as required under the

Arbitration and Conciliation Centre Rules,

2012.

Sd/-

JUDGE

rv

CT: BHK

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top