PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SRI. GOUTHAM VENKI – Appellant
Versus
SRI. GURUMURTHY – Respondent
Though this matter is listed at the stage of
admission, the same is taken for final disposal with the
consent of learned counsel for the appellant.
2.
This appeal arises out of judgment dated
25.08.2018
passed
in
C.C.No.1031/2015
by
the
Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Anekal, wherein the
learned JMFC acquitted the accused for the offences
punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments
Act, (for short hereinafter referred to as 'N.I. Act').
3.
Heard Sri.Srinivas, the learned counsel for
the appellant at the stage of admission itself.
4.
Though respondent is served, he remained
unrepresented.
- 3 -
5.
The
appellant
is
the
complainant
and
respondent is the accused before the Trial Court. They
will be referred as per their respective ranks held before
the Trial Court for the sake of convenience.
6.
In brief the case of the complainant is that
the complainant filed a private complaint under Section
200 of Code of Criminal Procedure (for short hereinafter
referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.) before the Principal Civil Judge &
JMFC, Anekal alleging that the accused has borrowed a
loan of Rs.4,00,000/- and issued the cheque which
came
to
be
dishonoured
with
an
endorsement
'insufficient f
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.