SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 19169

PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
H V CHANDRAIAH – Appellant
Versus
SRI N H RAJU – Respondent


This appeal is by the complainant challenging the

acquittal of respondent/accused for the offence punishable

under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act ('N.I Act'

for short).

2.

For the sake of convenience, the parties are

referred to by their rank before the trial Court.

3.

It is the case of the complainant that accused and

others started a company by name Surya Micro Technologies

Private Limited, Bengaluru. It is a company to introduce IT

network service. Accused is the Managing Director of the

said company. Complainant was working as Marketing Chief

in the said company. He enrolled and introduced various

members to the company for the last 34 years. He was

working on fixed salary and incentive. The incentives which

complainant was entitled was not paid and in this regard he

was issued with Cash certificates dated 01.12.2003 for

Rs.27,756/- and Rs.18,99,547/-. After their maturity, he was

- 3 -

not paid with the amount due under the said certificate.

When insisted upon, accused issued a post dated 10.06.2005

cheque for a sum of Rs.19,27,303/-. When complainant

presented the same to the Bank for encashment, it was

dishonored on the ground 'Account closed'. Compl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top