2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 19878
PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
MALLANAIKA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
CRL.RP 1056 2015
- 1 -
NC: 2023:KHC:23907
CRL.RP No. 1056 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JULY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1056 OF 2015
BETWEEN:
1.
MALLANAIKA
S/O KAVADE MALLANAIKA
AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS
RESIDENT OF PALYA VILLAGE
KOLLEGAL TALUK
CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT.
2.
MANJUNATHA
S/O MALLANAIKA
AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
RESIDENT OF PALYA VILLAGE
KOLLEGAL TALUK
CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. TRIVIKRAM., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY KOLLEGAL RURAL POLICE STATION
CHAMARAJANAGARA DISTRICT
REPRESENTED BY
THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
HIGH COURT BUILDINGS. …RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. RAHUL RAI., ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP FILED U/S.397 AND 401 CR.P.C BY THE
ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE
COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED
17.01.2015 PASSED IN C.C.NO.494/2010 BY THE PRL. CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC, KOLLEGAL CONFIRMED IN JUDGMENT
Digitally
signed by
SHAKAMBARI
Location:
HIGH COURT
OF
KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2023:KHC:23907
CRL.RP No. 1056 of 2015
DATED 16.09.2015 PASSED IN CRL.A.NO.5/2015 BY THE PRL.
DIST. AND S.J., CHAMARAJANAGARA AND ACQUIT THE
PETITIONERS IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
This Revision is preferred by accused nos. 1 and 2 being
aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and sentence passed
against them as per the judgment dated 17.01.2015 by the
Prl.Civil Judge and JMFC, Kollegal finding them guilty of
offences punishable under SEc.504, 323, 326, 506 read with
Sec.34 of IPC with a direction to pay a fine of Rs.500/- for the
offence punishable under Sec.504 r/w.Sec.34 of IPC and in
default of payment of fine, to undergo SI for 30 days, further
directed to pay Rs.500/- for the offence under section 323 r/w.
34 of IPC and in default of payment of fine, to undergo SI for
30 days and directed to undergo SI for 30 days further to under
SI for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.500 each and in
default, to undergo SI for 30 days and also directed them to
pay a fine of Rs.500/- and in default to undergo SI for 30 days
for the offence under Sec.506 r/w.Sec.34 of IPC.
- 3 -
NC: 2023:KHC:23907
CRL.RP No. 1056 of 2015
2. Parties to this petition are referred to as per their rank
before the trial Court for the purpose of convenience.
3. Heard the arguments of both the side.
4. The said judgment of conviction and sentence was
challenged by the petitioners by preferring criminal appeal
No.5/2015
before
the
Prl.District
and
Sessions
Judge,
Chamarajanagara, wherein, the said judgment of conviction
and sentence was confirmed by the First Appellate Court. Now
the petitioners are before this Court challenging both the
judgments of their conviction and sentence by filing this
revision.
5. Complainant-injured lodged a complaint against
accused persons as per Ex.P1 stating that he was the resident
of Jaraganahalli village, Kollegal Tq. It is stated that about two
months prior to the incident, accused nos. 1 and 2 dug up a
borewell in a Government land which is by the side of land of
the
accused
at
Palya
Village.
Complainant-Nagaraju,
S/o.Kalashetty objected for the same and submitted a petition
before the Tahsildar. Thereafter, the Tahsildar conducted the
spot inspection and forfeited the said borewell.
- 4 -
NC: 2023:KHC:23907
CRL.RP No. 1056 of 2015
6. It is alleged in the complaint that on 14.4.2010, at
about 5.30 p.m. when complainant was regulating water to his
lands, both the accused persons came there and abused him in
filthy and indecent language threatened him to take his life.
Mallanaika, assaulted with the club on his chest and
Manjunatha assaulted on hand, made the complainant to fall
down. They treaded him, threatened to kill him. In the said
inciden