SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 20878

PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SRI BADAIAH – Appellant
Versus
SRI KATAIAH – Respondent


This matter is listed for admission and I have heard the

learned counsel for the appellant.

The factual matrix of the case of the appellant-

plaintiff while seeking the relief of permanent injunction against

the defendant is that, he is the absolute owner and in

possession of an agricultural land measuring 1 acre, 35 guntas

bearing Sy.No.26/5 situated at Kodagavalli Village, which

includes the suit schedule 35 guntas of property. According to

the plaintiff, the suit schedule property originally belongs to his

grandmother one Alikamma, W/o. Alike Gowdra Badaiah of

Kodagavalli Village. It is the further case of the plaintiff that,

his grandmother, during her lifetime was in possession and

enjoyment of the suit schedule property and had died in the

year 1975 by leaving behind the plaintiff as her legal heir to

- 3 -

succeed her estates. As such, the plaintiff claims that, he had

inherited the suit schedule property from his grandmother and

acquired his right, title, interest and possession over the suit

schedule property. It is contended that the defendant is a

stranger to the suit schedule property and he is no way

concerned to the said property and has no manner of right

what

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top