PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SRI BADAIAH – Appellant
Versus
SRI KATAIAH – Respondent
This matter is listed for admission and I have heard the
learned counsel for the appellant.
The factual matrix of the case of the appellant-
plaintiff while seeking the relief of permanent injunction against
the defendant is that, he is the absolute owner and in
possession of an agricultural land measuring 1 acre, 35 guntas
bearing Sy.No.26/5 situated at Kodagavalli Village, which
includes the suit schedule 35 guntas of property. According to
the plaintiff, the suit schedule property originally belongs to his
grandmother one Alikamma, W/o. Alike Gowdra Badaiah of
Kodagavalli Village. It is the further case of the plaintiff that,
his grandmother, during her lifetime was in possession and
enjoyment of the suit schedule property and had died in the
year 1975 by leaving behind the plaintiff as her legal heir to
- 3 -
succeed her estates. As such, the plaintiff claims that, he had
inherited the suit schedule property from his grandmother and
acquired his right, title, interest and possession over the suit
schedule property. It is contended that the defendant is a
stranger to the suit schedule property and he is no way
concerned to the said property and has no manner of right
what
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.