SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 21094

PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SMT RENUKA – Appellant
Versus
MALLESH K H – Respondent


Challenging the dismissal of their suit, the plaintiffs

in O.S.No.146/2011 on the file of I-Additional Senior Civil

Judge, Davangere have preferred this appeal.

Appellants were plaintiff Nos.1 and 2 and the

respondents were defendant Nos.1 to 3 before the trial

Court. For the purpose of convenience, the parties will be

referred to henceforth according to their ranks before the

trial Court.

- 3 -

The case of the plaintiffs in brief is as follows:

(a)

Defendant No.3 is the wife of one K. Huchappa.

Huchappa had a son by name Ningappa. Nagamma was

the wife of said Ningappa. Ningappa, Nagamma and

Huchappa, predeceased Duggamma. Themselves and

defendant No.2 are the daughters and defendant No.1 is

son of Ningappa and Nagamma.

(b)

That Huchappa was working as Checking

Inspector in Davangere Municipality. Defendant No.3 had

no income of her own. Huchappa purchased all the suit

schedule properties in the name of Duggamma-defendant

No.3. Plaintiffs and defendant No.2 were all married and

residing in their matrimonial homes. Defendant No.2 after

the death of her husband on 20.08.2010, returned to her

parental house and has been residing with defendant No.1.

(c) Defendant No.1 taking undu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top