2023 Supreme(Online)(KAR) 21149
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.100204/2014
BETWEEN
1.
ASHOK S/O RAMAPPA ILIGAR,
AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE,
R/O: SAVATAGI, TQ: BAILHONGAL,
DIST: BELGAUM.
2.
RENUKA W/O RAMAPPA ILIGAR,
AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: SAVATAGI, TQ: BAILHONGAL,
DIST: BELGAUM.
.....APPELLANTS
(BY SRI M.B. GUNDAWADE, ADV.)
AND
STATE OF KARNATAKA
THROUGH DODAWAD POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY SPP,
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD.
…..RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. RAMESH CHIGARI, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S 374(2) OF CR.P.C.
SEEKING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED
29.09.2014 PASSED BY THE V-ADDL. DIST. & SESSIONS
JUDGE, BELGAUM, IN S.C.NO.334/2010 AND CONSEQUENTLY
BE ACQUIT ALL THE APPELLANTS FROM THE OFFENCES P/U/S
498-A, 306 R.W 34 OF IPC.
2
THIS APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD AND RESERVED FOR
ON
09.02.2023
THIS
DAY,
THE
COURT
PRONOUNCED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by the appellant/accused
under Section 374(2) of Code of Criminal Procedure,
1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’, for short)
challenging the judgment of conviction and order of
sentence passed by the learned V Addl. Sessions
Judge, Belagavi in S.C.No.334/2010 dated 29.09.2014
whereby the learned Sessions Judge has convicted the
accused/appellants herein for the offence punishable
under Section 498-A and 306 of Indian Penal Code,
1860 (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’, for short) by
imposing simple imprisonment for 1 year with fine of
Rs.5,000/- each for the offence punishable under
Section 498-A of IPC and simple imprisonment for 7
years with fine of Rs.10,000/- each with default
sentence.
3
For the sake of convenience, the parties
are referred to with the original rankings occupied by
them before the Trial Court.
3.
The brief factual matrix leading to the case
are that the accused No.1 is the husband of deceased
Rukmini and accused No.2 is her mother-in-law. It is
alleged that the marriage of deceased Rukmini with
accused No.1 was solemnized about two years prior to
her death. It is the case of the prosecution that both
the accused in furtherance of their common intention,
all along subjected the deceased to physical and
mental cruelty at Savatagi village, Bailhongal Taluk
under the pretext that the deceased was not cooking
properly, she do not know household work and as a
result, she suffered mental agony. It is also asserted
that the elders of the village have adviced the accused
in this regard but they did not improve their conduct.
Hence, it is alleged that on 12.03.2010 being unable
4
to tolerate the torture, the deceased consumed poison
and committed suicide. It is alleged that accused
have subjected the victim to ill-treatment and also
abetted her in committing suicide. The complainant
got information regarding victim being admitted in the
hospital and he rushed to the spot and found his
daughter dead. Then he went to police station along
with
his
another
brother-in-law
and
lodged
a
complaint. On the basis of the complaint, a crime
came to be registered and Investigating Officer visited
the scene of offence and drawn mahazar. He has also
drawn inquest mahazar and recording the statements
of witnesses. He found that there is sufficient
materials as against the accused and submitted the
charge sheet against the accused for the offences
punishable under Sections 498-A and 306 of IPC.
4.
After submission of charge sheet, as there
are grounds to proceed against the accused, the
5
cognizance was taken against the accused by the
learned Magistrate. The accused were arrested on
14.03.2010 and were released on bail on 31.03.2010.
Learned Magistrate provided the prosecution papers to
the
counsel
appearing
for
accused
and
then
committed the matter to the Sessions Court. Then
the matter was placed before the learned V Addl.
Sessions Judge, Belagavi and he secured the presence
of the accused and charge was framed which was
denied by the accused.
5.
To
prove
the
guilt
of
the
accused,
prosecution has examined in all 13 witnesses and has
also got marked 18 documents and 4 material objects.
After conclusion of the evidence of the prosecution,
the statement of accused under Section 313 of Cr.P.C.
was
recorded
to
enable
them
to
explain
the
incriminating evidence appearing against them in the
case of the prosecution. The case of the accused is of
6
total denial and they did not choose to lead any oral
or documentary evidence in support of their defence.
6.
After hearing the arguments and after
perusing the oral as well as documentary evidence,
the learned Sessions Judge has convicted the accused
for the offences punishable under Sections 498-A and
306 of IPC by imposing simple imprisonment for 1
year with fine of Rs.5,000/- for the offence punishable
under Section 498-A of IPC and simple imprisonment
for 7 years with fine of Rs.10,