PRINCIPAL BENCH AT BENGALURU
SRI M GANGANNA – Appellant
Versus
SRI RAMAMURTHY R – Respondent
The revision petitioner–accused in CC No.9068/2018
on the file of the learned XV Additional Chief Metropolitan
Magistrate, Bengaluru (hereinafter referred to as ‘the trial
court’ for the brevity), is impugning the judgment of
conviction and order of sentence dated 28.01.2020,
convicting him for the offence punishable under Section
138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (‘NI Act’ for short)
and sentencing him to pay fine of Rs.13,35,000/-, in
default to under-go simple imprisonment for six months,
which was confirmed in Crl.A.No.336/2020 on the file of
the learned LXIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge,
(CCH-64), Bangalore (hereinafter referred to as ‘the First
Appellate Court’ for brevity) vide its judgment dated
08.07.2022.
2.
For the sake of convenience, the parties are
referred to as per their rank and status before the trial
court.
- 3 -
3.
Brief facts of the case are that, the accused and
his wife Bhagya were known to the complainant since
several years. The accused and his wife Bhagya are the
absolute owners of the schedule property bearing No.41,
Ward No.99, Old No.64, PID No.99-114-41, situated at
Rajmahal Guttahalli, A.K.Colony, Bangalore measuring
East to Wes
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.