Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
P.N.DESAI, J
MR. VIJAYA MEGHARAJ – Appellant
Versus
MR.SHANKAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and introduction of involved parties. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments presented by both the appellant and the respondent. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. discussion on evidence and material alterations. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 18) |
| 4. final analysis of the legal implications of the case. (Para 17 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 5. conclusion and outcome of the appellate decision. (Para 24 , 25) |
JUDGMENT
This appeal arises out of the judgment of acquittal passed in C.C.No.8095/2006 dated 07.03.2012 by the XVIII ACMM & XX ASCJ, Bengaluru wherein the respondent/accused was acquitted for the offences punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act , 1881 (for short hereinafter referred to as 'N.I.Act').
2. The appellant filed a complaint before the learned Magistrate under Section 200 of Code of Criminal Procedure (for short hereinafter referred to as 'Cr.P.C.') against the accused for the offence punishable under Section 138 of N.I.Act.
3. The appellant is the complainant and the respondent is the accused before the Trial Court. They will be referred as per their respective ranks held before the Trial Court for the sake of convenience.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
