Back
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
KRISHNA S DIXIT, MR JUSTICE C M JOSHI, JJ
NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH – Appellant
Versus
SMT S ANITHA JOSEPH – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. learned panel counsel appearing (Para 2) |
| 2. having heard the learned counsel (Para 3) |
| 3. leave rules of the kind (Para 4) |
| 4. the above apart, india is (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. the modern medical science says (Para 7) |
| 6. the petitioner-nimhans which is (Para 8) |
| 7. the vehement submission of learned (Para 9) |
ORAL ORDER
(PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT)
Petitioner-NIMHANS, is knocking at the doors of Writ Court for assailing Central Administrative Tribunal's order dated 14.02.2024 whereby, respondents Original Application No.18/2023 having been favoured, it has been 'directed to consider grant of Child Care Leave from 14.1.2023 to 14.5.2023 for a period of 120 days and extend CCL benefits' within eight weeks.
2. Learned Panel Counsel appearing for the petitioner passionately submits that any leave is not a matter of right; whether application for leave should be granted or not involves a host of factors which are not judicially determinable; granting such a long leave would create difficulties in the ICU wherein, the respondent-employee is working; in any event, relief of the kind could not have been accorded to the employee. So arguing, he seeks invalidation of the impugned o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
